This article describes two atmosphere generation systems used for the production of replicas. The first, the Sputnic system, is based on the Sputnic air sampler developed by the National Institute of Occupational Health in Oslo (Norway). It is used to generate asbestos fibres or silica particles and allows the simultaneous production, by means of sampling on filters, of up to 114 replicas. The second is a multipurpose system that allows dust sampling on foams used with the CIP 10-R device. Twenty samples can be taken simultaneously. In total, 120 series of samples allowed characterization of the variability of the two generation systems used for the production of replicas loaded with asbestos fibres or silica dust. The coefficients of variation characterizing the dispersion of the filter loading in the Sputnic system are <10% for high densities asbestos fibre or silica dust samples. The coefficient of dispersion is on average higher when the asbestos fibre density is lower. The differences observed between the measurements taken on the different crowns of the Sputnic system are low and <2%. The results obtained with the multipurpose system show that replica dispersion is on average equal to 4%, which will allow proposal in the near future of a proficiency test dedicated to the quantitative analysis of crystalline silica on foams sampled with the CIP 10-R device.
Three methods of classifying laboratories during fibre counting proficiency tests were compared. The first two are those used in France (classification according to the mean and coefficient of variation of the results) and in Great Britain (classification according to the proportion of normalized results situated within predefined limits). The third is a variation of the Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) programme adapted to fibre counting tests. In the latter case, the laboratory classification is based on comparing the variance characterizing the dispersion of the results of a laboratory with a reference variance, which is considered as the variance of experienced analysts or laboratories. This mode of processing has the advantage of allowing the comparison of magnitudes. For example, the variance of the reference value can be compared with the reference variance. The same applies if a proficiency test is organized on the basis of replicas distributed to different analysts, the variability of these replicas can be compared with the reference variance. It emerged that the modified WASP method produces results close to those obtained by the other two methods. Moreover, the selectivity of the three methods is evaluated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.