Exemestane modestly enhanced bone loss from the femoral neck without significant influence on lumbar bone loss. Except for a 6% to 9% drop in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, no major effects on serum lipids, coagulation factors, or homocysteine were recorded. Bone mineral density should be assessed according to the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.
Background/Purpose
In sentinel node surgery for breast cancer, procedural accuracy is assessed by calculating the false-negative rate. It is important to measure this since there are potential adverse outcomes from missing node metastases. We performed a meta-analysis of published data to assess which method has achieved the lowest false-negative rate.
Methods
We found 3588 articles concerning sentinel nodes and breast cancer published from 1993 through mid-2011; 183 articles met our inclusion criteria. The studies described in these 183 articles included a total of 9306 patients. We grouped the studies by injection material and injection location. The false-negative rates were analyzed according to these groupings and also by the year in which the articles were published.
Results
There was significant variation in the false-negative rate over time with a trend to higher rates over time. There was significant variation related to injection material. The use of blue dye alone was associated with the highest false-negative rate. Inclusion of a radioactive tracer along with blue dye resulted in a significantly lower false-negative rate. Although there were variations in the false-negative rate according to injection location, none were significant. This meta-analysis also indicates a significant change over time in the false-negative rate.
Discussion/Conclusions
The use of blue dye should be accompanied by a radioactive tracer to achieve a significantly lower false-negative rate. Location of injection did not have a significant impact on the false-negative rate. Given the limitations of acquiring appropriate data, the false-negative rate should not be used as a metric for training or quality control.
554 Background: To evaluate potential detrimental effects of the aromatase inactivator exemestane on bone, 147 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer were randomised to receive either exemestane for 2 years or placebo (J. Clin. Oncol. 23 [22], 5126–5137, 2005). Exemestane increased the annual bone loss from the femoral neck (2.72%) compared to placebo (1.48%; P = 0.024) with a non-significant increase in the lumbar spine (exemestane 2.17% versus placebo 1.84%). The annual bone loss was higher than expected in the placebo arm. Methods: Various biomarkers involved in bone metabolism (25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathormone, calcium, estrogens, androgens) were analysed to elucidate their influence on bone status at baseline and BMD loss during treatment with exemestane compared to placebo. Results: Using a cut-off value of 30 ng/ml for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90 [6], 3800–3801, 2005), the majority of study participants suffered from vitamin D deficiency (56 of 62 patients in the placebo group and 52 of 59 in the exemestane group). The mean levels (95% confidence interval) of vitamin D were 22.6 ng/ml (21.2 - 24.1) in the placebo group and 21.6 ng/ml (20.0 - 23.3) in the treatment group, revealing no differences between these groups. Low serum calcium levels at baseline were found to be significantly correlated to low BMD in the femoral neck in the exemestane group. However, individual levels of vitamin D, parathormone and estradiol at baseline were not correlated significantly to BMD. Conclusions: Considering an annual bone loss of 0.5% to be representative for postmenopausal women (Osteoporos. Int. 15, 881–886, 2004), our data indicate that vitamin D deficiency could be the most important factor elevating bone loss among patients treated with exemestane as well as in the placebo group. These findings, together with the observation of a moderate additional effect of exemestane on bone loss, underlines the need for proper vitamin D substitution of postmenopausal women in general and in breast cancer patients during treatment with aromatase inhibitors in particular. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.