SUMMARY BackgroundSeveral views are expressed by surgeons on biliary complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy as follow: most are caused by trainees; complications occur in the presence of difficult anatomy/pathology; injuries occur more proximally than at open cholecystectomy; most injuries are recognised immediately and most can be managed non-operatively. The aim of our study was to determine if these views are substantiated in clinical practice. Methods The mode of presentation, management and outcome of thirty-two patients referred to a hepatobiliary unit over a seven year period were analysed. Results In 72% of cases the initial operator was a consultant. Five of the 32 complications (16%) occurred in the presence of difficult anatomy/pathology. Two patients had proximal biliary tree injuries, the only mortalities (two) occurring in this group. Only 41 % ofinjuries were detected immediately; 87% required surgical intervention, hepaticojejunostomy being the most common procedure performed (75%). Conclusion Our study shows that the majority of bile duct injuries are not caused by trainees, do not occur because of unusual anatomy/pathology, do not occur in the proximal biliary tree and are not recognised at the time of operation. Most injuries ultimately require major reconstructive surgery for definitive management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.