Total heavy metal concentrations were determined in soil samples of seven selected areas along the Guadiamar river valley affected by the toxic flood, after removal of the deposited sludge. Mean total concentrations of nine elements (As, Au, Bi, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb, Tl and Zn) out of the 23 (As, Au, Ba, Be, Bi, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, In, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sc, Sn, Th, Tl, U, V, Y and Zn) analysed were higher in sludge-covered soils than in unaffected soils. Mean values of total As, Au, Pb, Sb, Tl and Zn in sludge-affected soils were higher than the upper limits for normal soils world-wide. Mean concentrations of Bi, Cd and Cu were within these ranges, although some individual values exceeded the upper limits. In all sampling areas, severe heavy metal pollution was observed in the superficial layers (0-20 cm) of most of the affected soils, which decreased downward in the soil profile. Generally, in soils with more than 25% of clay, concentration of heavy metals below the 20-cm depth decreased to values close to those of the background level of the Guadiamar valley soils, while in coarser soils, heavy metal pollution penetrated below this depth, being noticeable down to a depth of at least 50-80 cm.
Concentration of seagulls in the Chafarinas Islands (three semi‐arid North African islets) induces profound changes in soil properties including eutrophication, salinization, acidification and nutrient imbalances. Soils of heavily seabird‐affected sites have significantly higher soluble K and NO3 levels (>20‐fold), Zn and Fe availability (>5‐fold), water‐retention capacity (>40% increase) and 15N enrichment, compared with control sites. These seabird‐induced soil changes are paralleled by (i) different patterns of abundance of the two main chenopod shrubs: Suaeda vera abundance is higher (>30‐fold) in seabird‐affected sites while Salsola oppositifolia largely dominates in low‐affected areas. No differences were found for Atriplex halimus. The abundance of the first two species may be largely explained by changes in soil soluble K‐to‐available Ca ratio whose value depends of the interaction between seabird products and soil constituents; (ii) significant increases in leaf N, P and Zn levels, and in all K ratios, paralelled by a decrease in Ca, in Salsola; but only by increased K/Na and P/Ca ratios in Suaeda leaves. These changes were significantly correlated to changes in species abundances; (iii) an increase of δ15N, paralleled by a decrease in δ13C values, in Salsola leaves but not in Suaeda. Conjoint analysis of the seabird‐related changes in soil properties, species abundance, leaf composition and differential response to the seabird‐induced fertilization/severity gradient of the two main chenopod shrub species, has led us to propose an explanatory hypothesis of seagull‐soil‐shrub relationships. According to this, the seagull‐induced soil changes, mediated by processes of (in)tolerance‐facilitation, play a main role in determining the abundance and the leaf nutrient status of the studied chenopod shrubs, which have contrasting physiological adaptations.
Abstract. Species composition, above‐ground biomass and diversity of herbaceous communities were recorded in 50 sites on the upper salt marsh of the Guadalquivir delta (SW Spain). Through Canonical Correspondence Analysis relationships were shown between plant‐species characteristics abundance and environmental variables. Seven community types were distinguished and related to hydro logical regime and physical and chemical soil parameters. The higher species richness was associated with moderate values of above‐ground biomass (Biomass at maximum diversity, BMD = 302 g/m2). Salinity was negatively correlated with species richness. There was no significant correlation with total above‐ground biomass. Water regime and soil nutrient (Ca, Mg) content were significant predictors of the community above‐ground biomass.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.