In 2012 there were 200 cases of public service disputes to be criminalized in East Java. They occured as a logical consequence of Act Number 14 Year 2008 leading to some consequences that public service is required to give satisfaction to the society The problem of health services in Indonesia cannot be separated from the low competence of the medical personnel, infrastructure and medical equipment, human resources, and complex regulations which are not easy to implement. Due to the problem above, a research focused on such policies to improve the capacity building by optimizing the role of Primary Health Center (PHC) as First Level Health Facility (FLHF) especially for Participants Social Health Insurance Provider (SHIP) is highly considered to carry out. The Social Health Insurance Provider is a legal entity established to administer the Health Insurance program, and the Primary Health Center is a health service facility that organizes some efforts on public and individual health at the first level. In ensuring the satisfaction of adequate services, FLHF has been working with PHC as the implementer of health services for SHIP participants. Because of it, PHC becomes the forefront to provide the health services to the community, especially, to SHIP participants. To increase the satisfaction of SHIP participants, it is necessary to note and find some ways out to the problems related to the improvement of Human Resources, Health Facilities, Service system, Information and supervision.
Business competition is actually a business between business actors, where the government does not need to interfere, but in order to create rules of the game in business competition, the government needs to intervene to protect consumers. Because if this is not done, there is a possibility that there will be collusion (collusion) between business actors which will lead to economic efficiency, which in the end is the consumer who will pay the expense of buying goods or services with inadequate price and quality. One of the effects of globalization is the free market. The domestic market has new challenges to compete with other sellers from abroad. The sellers who come usually come from developed countries where competition has long been practiced is a cartel. Business actors who are members of various associations in the discussion of amendments to Law No. 5 of 1999, also has a concept of revision of the Law. Amendments to Law No. 5 of 1999 is considered to only accommodate the interests of one party, namely the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). Business actors are subject to the law, among others. Objections submitted include amendments to fines for violating Law No. 5 of 1999 a maximum of 30% of turnover.
The decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is the result of the assessment of the Commission Council read out in an open session to the public regarding whether a violation has occurred and the imposition of sanctions or the absence of a violation. The formulation of the KPPU's decision consists of the alleged violation, consideration and assessment of evidence submitted and/or obtained during the trial as well as an analysis of the application of the articles in the Antimonopoly Law which the Reported Party allegedly violated. The KPPU decision is declared to have permanent legal force, if there is no objection from the business actor, and then the KPPU decision must be implemented by the business actor and may be requested for execution at the District Court. Considering the nature and type of KPPU's decisions, when viewed from the types of decisions in civil procedural law, the KPPU's decisions are Condemnatoir decisions, namely decisions that contain punishments and can be implemented. However, the regulations regarding KPPU Decisions that have permanent legal force still do not fulfill the requirements as condemnatoir decisions because KPPU is not a judicial institution and these regulations are still multi-interpretative in nature, namely that legislators do not provide a clear interpretation of the meaning of permanent legal force in KPPU's decisions.
Financial Technology or Fintech currently grows rapidly in Indonesia. The total of loan disbursement reached 155,902.55 Million IDR in the end of 2020. Alongside with it‟s development this digital tool like two blades which has negative and positive aspects. This research tries to explore the philosophy of consumer protection in online lending practices and investigate the consumer protection in the online loan collection mechanism by digital financial service providers in Indonesia. Through using some theory and literatures such as the justice theory, consumer protection, economic and law morality, digital document and supported by several primary and secondary legal materials to explain and answer the research question. The research method is the prescriptive by combining the types of doctrinal, reform-oriented, and theoretical research. The results obtained by the author found similarities between dispute resolution from the perspective of the consumer protection act with the arbitration protection law and alternative dispute resolution which both provide legal certainty to the parties
The provision in Article 2 of Marriage Law involves the religious values of marriage sacredness to legalize marriage. However, no explicit involvement of religious law was found in the divorce settlement as has been regulated in Article 39 paragraph 1 of Marriage Law stating that divorce can only be granted in front of a court session after the court has tried and failed to reconcile the two parties. Mediation process requires a mediator other than the judge, as regulated in Article 19, paragraph (1) of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation in Court Procedure. This paper focuses on Catholic married couple who filed a divorce application at District Court and involved pastor as the mediator for both parties. Pastors can be involved in divorce mediation of a Catholic married couple as regulated in Article 26 paragraph (1) of Supreme Court Regulation No 1 of 2016 concerning in-court Mediation Procedure that allow religious leader to serve as the mediator to reconcile a married couple who apply for a divorce. Therefore, the judge who presided over the divorce case can reject the divorce application filed by a Catholic married couple without pastoral consultation or mediation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.