This study shows that the favorable results of the maze III procedure in terms of freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias persist in most patients for at least 4 years.

AimsDuty-cycled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used for atrial fibrillation (AF) for around 5 years, but large-scale data are scarce. The purpose of this survey was to report the outcome of the technique.Methods and resultsA survey was conducted among 20 centres from seven European countries including 2748 patients (2128 with paroxysmal and 620 with persistent AF). In paroxysmal AF an overall success rate of 82% [median 80%, interquartile range (IQR) 74–90%], a first procedure success rate of 72% [median 74% (IQR 59–83%)], and a success of antiarrhythmic medication of 59% [median 60% (IQR 39–72%)] was reported. In persistent AF, success rates were significantly lower with 70% [median 74% (IQR 60–92%)]; P = 0.05) as well as the first procedure success rate of 58% [median 55% (IQR 47–81%)]; P = 0.001). The overall success rate was similar among higher and lower volume centres and were not dependent on the duration of experience with duty-cycled RFA (r = −0.08, P = 0.72). Complications were observed in 108 (3.9%) patients, including 31 (1.1%) with symptomatic transient ischaemic attack or stroke, which had the same incidence in paroxysmal and persistent AF (1.1 vs. 1.1%) and was unrelated to the case load (r = 0.24, P = 0.15), bridging anticoagulation to low molecular heparin, routine administration of heparin over the long sheath, whether a transoesophageal echocardiogram was performed in every patient or not and average procedure times.ConclusionDuty-cycled RFA has a self-reported success and complication rate similar to conventional RFA. After technical modifications a prospective registry with controlled data monitoring should be conducted to assess outcome.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that suffer from ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy have a very high risk of recurrent stroke and better prevention strategies are needed. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising secondary prevention strategy that may provide mechanical protection in patients that suffer from thrombo-embolic events under OAC. However, evidence showing effectiveness of LAAO in this population is scarce and the current international guidelines only consider LAAO in patients with a contra-indication for OAC. Purpose To compare percutaneous LAAO to standard-of-care including continuing/switching anticoagulation therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF and a prior thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus under OAC therapy. Methods The STR-OAC LAAO cohort is an international collaboration combining a selection of patients from multiple LAAO registries (22 participating centers). Patients that underwent percutaneous LAAO because of a thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus on OAC were included. Propensity score matching (optimal matching method, 1:1 ratio) with a previously published multi-center dataset of patients continuing/switching anticoagulation treatment after a thrombo-embolic event was performed to adjust for imbalances in age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and CHA2DS2-VASc score. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. Time-to-event analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional-hazard regression analyses. Results A total of 404 patients underwent LAAO between 2010–2021 and were included in the STR-OAC LAAO cohort. Mean age was 72±9 years; 44% was female and mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score were 4.8±1.7 and 2.5±1.4, respectively. Most patients received a Watchman or Amplatzer device (53% and 43%). Oral anticoagulation was discontinued after LAAO at discharge or after confirmation of adequate LAA closure at 1–3 months follow-up in 44% or 20%, respectively. The remaining 35% of patients continued OAC after LAAO as an adjunctive strategy. All LAAO patients were propensity-score matched and included in the primary outcome analysis. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after matching (Table 1). During follow up including 1406 patient-years (LAAO 1007; control 399) a total of 61 patients experienced an ischemic stroke: 2.2% per patient-year in LAAO group versus 9.8% per patient-year in the control group. LAAO was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (HR 0.33, 95% CI [0.19–0.59], p<0.001) compared to standard-of-care (Figure 1). Conclusion In this propensity-score matched study, LAAO was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke compared to standard-of-care in patients with a thrombo-embolic event and/or LAA thrombus despite OAC treatment. Randomized controlled trial data may further confirm the effectiveness of LAAO in this very high-risk population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.