Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or metastatic plus locally advanced breast cancer received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles. Results: From December 1999 to August 2001, 45 patients, with a median age of 53.5 years (range, 22–77), received a total of 260 cycles. All were assessable for response and toxicity. Twenty-seven patients had prior adjuvant therapy. Hormonal receptor status was positive in 31.1% and negative in 40.0% of patients. Main metastatic sites included soft tissue (62.2%) and lung (53.3%). The objective response rate was 66.7%; complete response, 22.2%; partial response, 44.4%; stable disease, 15.6%; progressive disease, 17.8%. Median duration of response was 18 months and median time to tumor progression was 11 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia developed in 13.3% of patients, and 15.5% developed grade 3/4 mucositis. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Median overall survival was 19 months. Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel is an active combination with a favorable toxicity profile as first-line treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND A prospective, multicenter, randomized, Phase III trial comparing the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5‐fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with a combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin (NA) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma was undertaken. METHODS One hundred and seventy‐seven patients who previously were untreated for recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma were entered into the study; 7 patients could not be assessed. The final analysis relates to 85 patients who were treated with FAC and 85 patients who were treated with NA, of whom 21 (25%) and 44 (52%), respectively, had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS The overall response rates were similar for the two treatments and were unaffected by prior exposure to adjuvant therapy; overall response rate (ORR) for FAC was 74% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 65–83%), and the ORR for NA was 75% (95% CI, 66–84%). The activity of NA in patients with liver involvement was greater than that of FAC in terms of survival. Overall survivals were similar, with a median of 17.3 months for patients receiving FAC and 17.8 months for patients receiving NA. Severe toxicity was uncommon with World Health Organization Grade 3–4 neutropenia affecting only 7% of patients in each arm of the study. NA was associated with a higher incidence of mild to moderate constipation, neurotoxicity, and phlebitis, whereas FAC produced a slight excess of mild cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of these two regimens is very similar, although NA may be more active in a subset of patients with visceral metastatic disease, particularly liver involvement. It is clear that, in a direct comparison with an established three‐drug regimen, the newer two‐drug combination of NA demonstrated equivalent activity with no significant excess of Grade 3–4 toxicity. Cancer 1999;85:1091–7. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

The overall response (OR) rate was 76%. No CHF was assessed and 2 patients stopped treatment due to LVEF decrease. Although doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed by Taxol 200 mg/m2 in 1-h intravenous infusion presents a toxicity profile which demands a close follow-up, it represents a convenient outpatient schedule with similar activity rate compared to longer Taxol infusions.

203 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized to receive ifosfamide (IFO) 2.5 g/m² days 1-2 + epirubicin (EPI) 70 mg/m² day 1 with cisplatin (DDP) 70 mg/m² day 1 (arm IEP), or without cisplatin (arm IE). For uroprophylaxis, mesna i.v. 20% of IFO dose, hour 0 and 3, and oral, 40% of IFO dose, hour 6 and 9, days 1-2 was given. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Four cycles were required for evaluation purposes. After completion of chemotherapy, external beam irradiation 40 Gy was given over 4 weeks for stage III B responders. Most of the patients with stable disease, partial response or complete response (CR) received 6 cycles. The median follow-up of the trial is 30 months. There were no differences in overall response rates: arm IEP: 52% (2% CR); arm IE: 51% (13.5% CR). Median time to progression was 6 months (arm IEP) and 4 months (arm IE) (p = 0.4844). Toxicity ranged from mild to moderate. Nephrotoxicity was not seen; only 6 patients had neurotoxic side effects of short duration. Median survival according to treatment was 12 months for IEP arm (12% at 2 years) and 10 months for IE arm (21 % at 2 years). IFO/mesna + EPI or IFO/mesna, EPI plus DDP appeared to be an active and well tolerated combination for the treatment of NSCLC, with a good survival time.

No abstract