Thirty-four Campylobacter jejuni or coli strains, isolated from various livestock and darkling beetles from two Dutch poultry farms during different broiler production cycles, were subjected to Penner serotyping and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprint analysis. Ten different Penner serotypes were determined in the isolates. Visual scoring of the PCR fingerprints resulted in 14 clearly different profiles. Some strains with identical Penner serotypes exhibited different PCR fingerprints and conversely strains with different serotypes produced identical PCR fingerprints. Discrepancies between Penner serotyping and PCR fingerprinting were most obvious between isolates from different animal sources. Indications for the occurrence of genomic rearrangements were found. The inconsistency between serotyping and fingerprinting of Campylobacter strains suggests that conventional typing methods should be used in combination with fingerprinting if the epidemiological factors that contribute to Campylobacter colonization of live chickens are to be assessed reliably.
Seventy-seven Salmonella isolates comprising 61 different serotypes were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting using two primersets. Primerset L1/G1, amplifying the spacer regions between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, resulted in simple PCR fingerprints. However, in some cases PCR amplification of different Salmonella serotypes with primerset L1/G1 resulted in identical fingerprint profiles. Fingerprints obtained with the ERIC primerset, that matches the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence, were more complicated but were serotype-specific. Consequently, fingerprinting with the ERIC primerset is applicable for typing Salmonella up to the serotype level. Fingerprinting with the L1 and G1 primers requires an additional treatment of the amplification product for accurate typing of salmonellas. Phage typing is not possible with either primerset.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.