This study aimed to investigate the interface pressure (IP) of patients using a standard hospital mattress and polyurethane foam mattress as support surfaces and present cut-off points for IP in patients who exhibited skin changes. A total of 189 inpatients enrolled from six general wards and three intensive care units at a Korean University Hospital. Skin changes were classified, and peak IP at the sacral and occipital regions was measured using a pressure scanner. Differences in IPs according to mattress type were analysed using independent t-tests. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the cut-off point, and the area under the curve with a 95% confidence interval was obtained using the Stata 15.1.program. The IP for a standard hospital mattress was significantly higher than that of a polyurethane foam mattress. The cut-off points for IP at the sacral region were 52.90 and 30.15 mm Hg for a standard hospital mattress and polyurethane foam mattress, respectively. The cut-off point for IP at the occipital region was 36.40 mm Hg for a polyurethane foam mattress. Using IP measurements to prevent pressure injuries is important and employ individualised interventions based on the cut-off points for different support surfaces.
Background: As chronic wounds such as pressure injuries (PIs) are frequently colonized and can easily deteriorate into infection, it is important to reduce their bacterial load, for which antimicrobial dressings can be needed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a 3% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) foam dressing compared to that of a silver foam dressing.Methods: This prospective non-inferiority study was conducted between 2016 and 2019 at three sites in South Korea. A total of 80 PI subjects were randomized to be dressed with either PVP-I foam (experimental group) or silver foam (control group) for up to 8 weeks.Results: Based on the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool, 25.0% of the experimental groups and 17.5% of the control groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=0.743, P=0.389) healed by more than 70%. The degree of reduction in wound size was analyzed using Image J, and the experimental and control groups decreased by 41.6%±35.3% and 49.7%±38.2% (t=–0.986, P=0.327), respectively. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to confirm the time to heal showed that if more than 30% of the PUSH score was healed, the time to heal was 27.0±9.3 days and 18.0±2.8 days in the two groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=3.225, P=0.073), respectively. The healing rates at 50 days were 85.8%±8.9% and 93.9%±5.7% in the two groups (P=0.073), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in all results.Conclusion: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of the 3% PVP-I foam dressing compared to the silver foam dressing for PI treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.