No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the characteristic MR findings of the anomalous insertion of the medial meniscus (AIMM) into the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and to document potential pitfalls in its interpretation. We reviewed 1326 consecutive knee arthroscopic studies to identify patients with an AIMM. 30 knees of 26 patients (4 females, 22 males; average age, 31.3 years; range, 14-50 years) were included in this study. We evaluated the presence of an AIMM and analysed the MR findings, including the ACL attachment sites of the AIMMs, the absence of the transverse ligament, meniscal tears and a discoid meniscus. AIMMs were detected by MR imaging in 16 knees of 18 patients (60%, 18/30). The AIMMs showed a linear band with low signal intensity on T2 weighted sagittal images running parallel to the ACL. The AIMMs were inserted into the lower portion of the ACL in eight knees, the middle portion in five knees, and the intercondylar notch in five knees. Meniscal tears (10 medial, 10 lateral) were found in 20 knees of 16 patients. Six knees of five patients showed a discoid meniscus. 15 knees of 14 patients showed no transverse ligament on MR imaging. An AIMM has the potential to be misinterpreted as a meniscal tear, ACL tear or infrapatellar plica on knee MR imaging. Familiarity with the characteristic MR findings can aid in the detection of an AIMM into the ACL.

No abstract

Purpose: To analyze differences in clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between remnant-preserving and non-preserving methods. Methods: International electronical databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central database from January 1966 to December 2017 were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared differences of clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with and without remnant preservation. A metaanalysis of these studies was performed to compare clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the role of methodological quality in primary meta-analysis estimates. Results: Five RCTs and six observational studies were included in this meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. The remnant-preserving method in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction showed a statistically significant difference compared to the non-preserving method regarding arthrometric evaluation (side-to-side difference). Lachman test, Lysholm scores, and IKDC subjective scores showed statistically minor difference in meta-analysis, but showed no significant difference in subgroup analysis. Remained parameters including pivot shift test, IKDC grades, incidence of cyclops lesion showed no statistically differences in meta-analysis or subgroup analysis. Conclusions: This meta-analysis with subgroup analysis showed that arthroscopic remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction provided statistically significant but limited clinical relevance in terms of arthrometric evaluation. Results of Lachman test, Lysholm scores, and IKDC subjective scores demonstrated statistically minor differences.

No abstract

Purpose Our purpose in the current meta-analysis was to compare the functional outcomes in patients who have received single-radius (SR) or multi-radius (MR) femoral components in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that there would be no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of functional outcomes. Materials and methods We searched the international electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 2020 for RCTs that compared functional outcomes of SR and MR femoral component designs after primary TKA. We performed a meta-analysis of nine RCTs using the Knee Society Score for the knee (KSS-knee), KSS-function, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), degree of knee flexion, extension, and complications, including postoperative infection and revision surgery. Results The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in all the analyzed variables, including KSS-knee, KSS-function, KOOS, OKS, knee flexion, and knee extension. For postoperative complications, no statistically significant differences were detected for femoral component designs in postoperative infection or incidence of revision surgery between the two groups. Conclusions The current meta-analysis of RCTs did not show any statistically significant differences between SR and MR femoral component designs in terms of postoperative functional outcomes. Evaluated outcomes included functional outcome scores, degree of knee flexion, extension, and complications. However, because of the limited clinical evidence of this study owing to the heterogeneity between the included RCTs, a careful approach should be made in order not to arrive at definite conclusions.

No abstract