This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a protooncogene that encodes epidermal growth factor receptor with tyrosine kinase activity, located on chromosome 17 at q21. In breast cancers, HER2 gene is amplified in 15%-20% of invasive breast cancers and its amplification is closely linked to HER2 protein overexpression [1,2]. HER2 amplification is a poor prognostic factor associated with a high rate of recurrence and mortality, and is a predictive factor for response to anthracyclinebased chemotherapies in patients with breast cancer [1,2]. Most importantly, it is a sole predictive marker for treatment benefits from HER2-targeting agents such as trastuzumab, lapatinib, and pertuzumab. As HER2-targeted therapy is exclusively effective in HER2-overexpressed and/or HER2-amplified breast cancers, precise assessment of HER2 status is an essential step for treatment of breast cancer. In this review, we focused on changes in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/ College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines on HER2 interpretation and some pitfalls in the interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancers. METHODS OF HER2 TESTINGCurrently, immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) including silver in situ hybridization (SISH) are regarded as standard methods for determination of HER2 status in breast cancer, and some of them have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for HER2 testing in breast cancer since 1998.Although HER2 status can be directly tested by in situ hybridization (ISH), many laboratories have adopted IHC as a screening test, and FISH as a confirmation test for HER2 IHC equivocal cases, considering higher failure rate, longer procedure time and higher reagent cost of FISH, compared to that of IHC. Moreover, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and/or HER2 gene amplification is found in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. It is a sole predictive marker for treatment benefits from HER2 targeted therapy and thus, HER2 testing is a routine practice for newly diagnosed breast cancer in pathology. Currently, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used for a screening test, and in situ hybridization is used as a confirmation test for HER2 IHC equivocal cases. Since the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines on HER2 testing was first released in 2007, it has been updated to provide clear instructions for HER2 testing and accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. During HER2 interpretation, some pitfalls such as intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity and increase in chromosome enumeration probe 17 signals m...

The aim of this study was to determine the clinicopathological significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in glioblastoma (GBM). In a retrospective cohort of 115 consecutive patients with GBM, PD-L1 expression was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Membranous and fibrillary PD-L1 staining of any intensity in > 5% neoplastic cells and tumour infiltrating immune cells (TIIs) was considered positive staining. In addition, isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH-1) (R132H) expression and cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3)-positive T-cell infiltration were investigated using IHC. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the assessment of 1p/19q deletion were performed. Expression of PD-L1 in tumour cells and TIIs was found in 37 (32.2%) and 6 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression in tumour cells was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (P = 0.017), though multivariate Cox analysis did not confirm this association (hazard ratio 1.204; P = 0.615). PD-L1 expression in TIIs did not correlate with the patient prognosis (P = 0.545). In addition, MGMT methylation and IDH-1 (R132H) expression were associated with a better prognosis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024, respectively). The expression of PD-L1 was associated with CD3-positive T-cell infiltration (P < 0.001), and IDH-1 wild type status (P = 0.008). A deeper insight into PD-L1 expression could help to ensure the success of future immunotherapy in GBM. Our study suggested that PD-L1 target therapy might be beneficial for PD-L1-expressing GBM patients with a poor prognosis.

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1), a ligand for human epidermal growth factor (HER) 3 and HER4, can activates cell signaling pathways to promote carcinogenesis and metastasis. To investigate the clinicopathologic significance of NRG1 and its receptors, immunohistochemistry was performed for NRG1, HER3, and HER4 in 502 consecutive gastric cancers (GCs). Furthermore, HER2, microsatellite instability (MSI), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status were investigated. NRG1 gene copy number (GCN) was determined by dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 388 available GCs. NRG1 overexpression was observed in 141 (28.1%) GCs and significantly associated with aggressive features, including infiltrative tumor growth, lymphovascular, and neural invasion, high pathologic stage, and poor prognosis (all P < 0.05), but not associated with EBV, MSI, or HER2 status. HER3 cytoplasmic and membranous expression were observed in 157 (31.3%) and 13 (2.6%), respectively. HER4 cytoplasmic expression was observed in 277 (55.2%), including 115 (22.9%) cases with nuclear expression. In contrast to NRG1, cytoplasmic expression of HER3 and HER4 proteins were not associated with survival, but GC patients with HER3 membranous expression showed significantly worse survival. In addition, HER4 nuclear expression was inveresely correlated with patients outcome in GC. NRG1 overexpression was also closely correlated with HER3 (P = 0.034) and HER4 (P < 0.001) cytoplasmic expression. NRG1 GCN gain (GCN ≥ 2.5) was detected in 14.7% patients, including two cases of amplification, and was moderately correlated with NRG1 overexpression (κ, 0.459; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified NRG1 overexpression as an independent prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.040), unlike HER3 and HER4 expression. In 14 HER2positive GC with trastzumab combined chemotherapy, coexpression of NRG1 and HER3 was detected in 2 (14.3%) cases, and these GC patients group with coexpression of NRG1 and HER3 also showed a shorter PFS (P = 0.005).Although our results indicate a lack of prognostic significance of HER3 and HER4 overexpression in GC, overexpression of their ligand, NRG1, was associated with aggressive clinical features and represented an independent unfavorable prognostic factor. Therefore, NRG1 is a potential prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in GC patients.--

Background:Aquaporin 1 (AQP1) overexpression has been shown to be associated with uncontrolled cell replication, invasion, migration, and tumor metastasis. We aimed to evaluate AQP1 expression in lung adenocarcinomas and to examine its association with clinicopathological features and prognostic significance. We also investigated the association between AQP1 overexpression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers.Methods:We examined AQP1 expression in 505 cases of surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas acquired at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2012. Expression of AQP1 and EMT-related markers, including Ecadherin and vimentin, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray.Results:AQP1 overexpression was associated with several aggressive pathological parameters, including venous invasion, lymphatic invasion, and tumor recurrence. AQP1 overexpression tended to be associated with higher histological grade, advanced pathological stage, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation; however, these differences were not statistically significant. In addition, AQP1 overexpression positively correlated with loss of E-cadherin expression and acquired expression of vimentin. Lung adenocarcinoma patients with AQP1 overexpression showed shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 46.1 months vs. 56.2 months) compared to patients without AQP1 overexpression. Multivariate analysis confirmed that AQP1 overexpression was significantly associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 1.429; 95% confidence interval, 1.033 to 1.977; p=.031).Conclusions:AQP1 overexpression was thereby concluded to be an independent factor of poor prognosis associated with shorter PFS in lung adenocarcinoma. These results suggested that AQP1 overexpression might be considered as a prognostic biomarker of lung adenocarcinoma.

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is known to be associated with prognosis and treatment response in breast cancer. This study was conducted to determine whether copy number gain of centromere 17 (CEP17) reflects CIN, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of CIN in breast cancer. CIN status was determined by summing copy number gains of four centromeric probes (CEP1, CEP8, CEP11, and CEP16) based on fluorescence in situ hybridization and CIN scores were calculated using next generation sequencing data. High CIN was associated with adverse clinicopatholgical parameters of breast cancer. Among them, positive HER2 status, high Ki-67 index and CEP17 copy number gain were found to be independent predictors of high CIN. High CIN was associated with poor clinical outcome of the patients in the whole group, as well as in luminal/HER2-negative and HER2-positive subtypes. CEP17 copy number was significantly higher in the high-CIN-score group than in the low-CIN-score group. A positive linear correlation between the mean CEP17 copy number and the CIN score was found. In conclusion, CEP17 copy number was confirmed as a useful predictor for CIN in breast cancer, and high CIN was revealed as an indicator of poor prognosis in breast cancer.

No abstract

Amyloid β (Aβ) and/or ATP activate the NLRP3 inflammasome (N3I) via P2X7R in microglia, which is crucial in neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Due to polymorphisms, subtypes, and ubiquitous expression of P2X7R, inhibition of P2X7R has not been effective for AD. We first report that taurodeoxycholate (TDCA), a GPCR19 ligand, inhibited the priming phase of N3I activation, suppressed P2X7R expression and P2X7R-mediated Ca++ mobilization and N3I oligomerization, which is essential for production of IL-1β/IL-18 by microglia. Furthermore, TDCA enhanced phagocytosis of Aβ and decreased the number of Aβ plaques in the brains of 5x Familial Alzheimer’s disease (5xFAD) mice. TDCA also reduced microgliosis, prevented neuronal loss, and improved memory function in 5xFAD mice. The pleiotropic roles of GPCR19 in P2X7R-mediated N3I activation suggest that targeting GPCR19 might resolve neuroinflammation in AD patients.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression provides significant value to predict prognosis and response following immunotherapy in several types of cancers. However, its clinicopathological and prognostic significance in melanoma remains unclear. PD-L1 and the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were investigated in 63 Korean patients with melanoma based on the melanoma scoring system. We also compared the results using the PD-L1 antibodies—22C3 and E1L3N clones. In addition, BRAF gene mutation was detected using anti-BRAF antibody and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Overall, 29 (46.0%), 16 (25.4%), and 18 (28.6%) patients exhibited the acral lentiginous type, nodular type, and other histological subtypes of melanoma, respectively. PD-L1 expression was detected in 37 (58.7%) cases and was closely associated with a CD8+TIL high phenotype ( P < 0.001). Combined survival analysis depending on PD-L1 and CD8+TILs status showed that the PD-L1-/CD8+TIL high group demonstrated the best survival outcome, whereas patients with PD-L1+/CD8+ TIL low showed the worst prognosis ( P = 0.039). However, PD-L1+/CD8+ TIL low was not an independent prognostic factor. The 22C3 and E1L3N clones showed a high concordance rate (kappa value, 0.799). BRAF mutation status was not correlated with PD-L1 expression. We suggest that evaluation of the combined status of PD-L1 and TIL might be useful to predict the survival of patients with melanoma.