Background Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported, and the underlying reason remains poorly understood. Therefore, the relationship between angiographic measurements and FFR was evaluated, and predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary artery stenosis were determined. Methods Consecutive 314 patients (405 lesions) with a lesion of 30–80% angiographic diameter stenosis who underwent invasive FFR were recruited. The myocardial area supplied by the coronary artery distal to the stenosis was evaluated using a modified version of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) score. Participants underwent follow-up, and major cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization were recorded. Results Although % diameter stenosis was correlated with FFR (R = 0.279, P < 0.001), diameter stenosis-FFR mismatch was observed in 37.8% of the lesions. Although FFR values were not associated with clinical factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, it was correlated with minimal lumen diameter (MLD), diffuse lesion, presence of proximal lesion, and BARI score. In addition, the lesions in left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery showed low FFR values compared with those in the left circumflex coronary artery or right coronary artery. In multivariate logistic analysis, MLD (β coefficient = 0.330), diffuse lesion (β coefficient = –0.266), proximal lesion (β coefficient = –0.144), BARI score (β coefficient = –0.219), and LAD lesion (β coefficient = –0.293) were all independent predictors for FFR value. The estimated FFR value based on these factors showed smaller mismatch and higher sensitivity. No difference was observed in the event rates for MACE and MI or revascularization between the FFR-guided and estimated FFR-guided strategies. Conclusions MLD, diffuse lesion, proximal lesion, BARI score, and lesion vessel were independent predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. Not only the extent of local lesion stenosis but also the amount of myocardial supply and the lesion location may determine the physiological significance and explain the visual–functional mismatch. The estimation of FFR by these factors may be useful in clinical practice.
The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is used for assessing the hemodynamic severity of a lesion, as an alternative to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). We evaluated the relationship between iFR and FFR in detail and the clinical significance of iFR in patients with mild to intermediate coronary artery stenosis. We recruited consecutive 323 patients (421 lesions) with lesions exhibiting 30% to 80% diameter stenosis on angiography in whom FFR and iFR were measured. In the total lesions, mean diameter stenosis was 48.6% ± 9.0%, and physiological significance, defined by FFR of 0.80 or less or by iFR of 0.92 or less, was observed in 32.5% or 33.5%, respectively. Mismatch between iFR and FFR was observed in 18.1% of the lesions. Clinical factors did not predict FFR value; however, gender, diabetes mellitus, aortic stenosis, anemia, high-sensitivity CRP value, and renal function predicted iFR value. In multivariate logistic analysis after adjustment for FFR value, gender (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.005), aortic stenosis (p = 0.016), high-sensitivity CRP (p < 0.001), and renal function (p = 0.003) were all independent predictors of iFR value. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the baseline iFR predicted the subsequent major cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16-4.93; p = 0.018) and the results of the iFR-guided strategy for predicting rates of MACE and myocardial infarction/revascularization were superior to those of the FFR-guided strategy. In conclusion, significant clinical factors predicted iFR value, which affected the prognostic capacity. The iFR-guided strategy may be superior in patients with mild to intermediate stenosis.
Background: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using an original analysis tool in the compartment model for detecting regional significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and Results:This study analyzed 41 patients (median age, 76 years) with suspected or known CAD who underwent both dynamic SPECT using 99 m Tc-tetrofosmin and invasive coronary angiography. The quantitative analysis was performed using a singletissue compartment model to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) for regional significant CAD, excluding infarcted territories. In the regional analysis, 114 vessels were assessed, of which 31 were diagnosed as significant coronary lesions (≥70% stenosis and/or fraction flow reserve ≤0.8). The MFR of regional significant CAD was significantly lower than that of non-significant CAD (1.11 [0.97-1.31] vs. 1.74 [1.30-2.27]; P<0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the MFR displayed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. While analyzing each coronary artery territory, the diagnostic performance of the MFR value in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery territory was found to be significantly higher than that found in qualitative assessment (AUC: 0.84 vs. 0.61). Conclusions:A quantitative analysis of dynamic SPECT data facilitated detecting regional CAD. For the LAD artery, the MFR displayed a higher diagnostic performance than the qualitative assessment of conventional myocardial perfusion SPECT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.