ABSTRACT. An All Power Labs PP20 gasifier generation set (Berkeley, Calif.) any promising technologies are emerging for the conversion of residual forest waste to useful products. These processes are collectively known as biomass conversion technologies (BCTs) and include processes such as torrefaction, densification, and biochar production. However, the feasibility of BCT projects is highly dependent on the transportation economics of the unprocessed waste biomass (Pan et al., 2008). From a transportation economics standpoint, it is often optimal to place a BCT operation as close to the fuel source as possible. Examples include forest landing sites, at the roadside, or in locations close to forestry operations, such as former sawmills. Although optimal for transportation costs, technological and logistical challenges arise when operating a BCT in remote locations. A key logistical factor for BCT operation is obtaining a reliable source of electricity. Many potential sites do not have access to grid electricity, and a remote power source is therefore required to provide electricity to the BCT.
BACKROUNDIn a previous study by Severy et al. (2016), various remote power generation technologies were compared for their potential feasibility for providing power at a remote forest landing site. The technologies evaluated in this study were an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery device, a thermoelectric generator, a biomass gasifier with an engine generator (All Power Labs Power Pallet, Berkeley, Calif.), a solar PV array with battery storage, and a shaft work power generator. The generation sources were evaluated based on their mobility, footprint, reliability, operational intensity, electrical load following ability, environmental impact, capital cost, operational cost safety, and ease of permitting. The results of the technoeconomic feasibility study concluded that a biomass gasifier was the preferred alternative technology to replace a diesel generator at a BCT site due to its mobility, small footprint, competitive lifecycle cost, and quoted load following abilities (Severy et al., 2016). To validate the results of the feasibility study and extend research on the topic, the goal of this study is to evaluate the suitability of the APL PP20 for powering biomass conversion technologies in the greater Pacific Northwest area. The objectives are to measure the power output and load following capabilities, quantify the emission rates, and provide electricity to a remote BCT that has a fluctuating load. By conducting these tests, the authors can verify whether this gasifier generator is a technically-viable alternative to a diesel generator at offgrid locations.
GASIFIER AS AN ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCEGasification technology has been used for decades (Ghosh et al., 2006). However, due to relatively recent technology improvements, there has been an increase in development and interest in the technology. Ahrenfeldt et al. (2013) review the state of the art of biomass gasification combined heat and power (CHP) syst...
