To compare the intermediate-term outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and radical external beam radiotherapy (RT) in Chinese patients with localised prostate cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with localised prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2011 and treated with either RALP or RT. Baseline patient and disease characteristics, posttreatment complications, and latest disease status were retrospectively collected from hospital records. For assessment of patient-reported outcomes, the Chinese version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire was completed by the patients. Results: Ninety three patients aged 58 to 84 years were recruited. Thirty patients were treated by RALP (32.3%), whereas 63 received RT (67.7%). The RALP group had significantly lower baseline prostatespecific antigen levels than the RT group (P<0.001). More patients who underwent RALP reported urinary incontinence (70.0% vs 3.2%, P<0.001), whereas more patients who underwent RT reported other voiding symptoms (87.3% vs 50.0%, P<0.001) and perirectal bleeding (36.5% vs 0%, P<0.001) during follow-up. Of the 85 patients who were still alive at the time of the study, 52 (61.2%) returned completed questionnaires. Patients who underwent RALP had poorer median (interquartile range)
Backgrounds: Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been an active treatment in patients (pts) with HER2−positive breast cancer; however, primary and secondary resistance has occurred in pts treated with trastuzumab (H) alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Material and Methods: Biomarkers were searched using tissue microarrays (TMA) in the HER2−positive breast cancer pts treated with H and paclitaxel (P) combination chemotherapy between October 2004 and August 2010. Tumor blocks of 101 pts were analyzed for VEGF, IGF-1R, p-Akt, beta-III tubulin, CD44, Tau-protein, p27 and PTEN by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Eight biomarkers were assessed to investigate the correlation with the clinical outcomes, including response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: With a median follow-up duration of 21.7 months (range, 9.1−55.2 months), 101 pts received H+P chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting (n=36, 35.6%) and recurrent or metastatic setting (n=65, 64.4%). Median age was 48 (range, 19–83 years), and the majority of pts (n=95, 94.1%) had good performance status. Premenopausal pts and hormone receptor-negative pts were 48 (47.5%) and 52 (51.5%), respectively. The median cycle of H+P chemotherapy was six (range, H 1–43; P 1–21). Overall RR was 68.3% (n=69) including complete response with 7 pts, and PFS and OS were significantly longer in pts responsive to H+P chemotherapy compared with non-responsive patients (PFS, p=0.001; OS, p=0.015). Although VEGF, IGF-1R, p-Akt, beta-III tubulin, CD44, p27 and PTEN status by IHC were not significantly associated with response to H+P chemotherapy, Tau-protein showed a trend of association without statistical significance (RR, 46.2% vs. 71.6%, p=0.066). Among 13 pts with high Tau protein expression, 9 pts with both high Tau-protein and low PTEN level showed statistically significant lower RR compared with other 92 pts (22.2% vs. 72.8%; p=0.002). None of the biomarkers was related to PFS and OS in pts with recurrent or metastatic disease, and to pathologic complete response in pts after H+P chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Our data showed that both low PTEN level and high Tauprotein expression were significantly associated with poor response to H+P chemotherapy in patients with HER2−positive breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-11.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.