Aim The aim of this study was to develop the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale through assessment of previously developed tools, a literature review and a modified Delphi process. Methods We carried out a systematic review to identify previously published anticholinergic burden tools. A composite medication list was made by extracting medications and their quantitative grading from the existing tools, after excluding the medications not distributed in Korea and topical agents. We also added medications available in Korea that had not been rated. For medications with conflicting anticholinergic scores or no anticholinergic score, we determined the final score from 0 (“no anticholinergic effect”) to 3 (“strong anticholinergic effect”) with a literature review and expert consensus through a two‐round Delphi process. Results A composite list of 655 medications with anticholinergic scores was extracted from 10 existing tools. A total of 38 medications available in Korea were added to the list. A total of 494 medications were deemed suitable for a Korean‐specific scale. We confirmed the anticholinergic scores of 352 medications from existing scales, and 142 underwent the Delphi process. The final scores graded by experts showed high reliability among experts with an intra‐class correlation of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.97–0.98). Finally, 56 medications were categorized as strong anticholinergics, 23 as moderate, 59 as weak and 356 as having no anticholinergic activity. Conclusions This newly created consensus‐driven anticholinergic burden scale designed specifically for the Korean healthcare system might be a practical tool for assessing anticholinergic burden in older adults with polypharmacy in routine medication reviews and in research. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 628–634.

Few studies have evaluated the association between anticholinergic burden and treatment modification after starting a cholinesterase inhibitor in clinical practice.We aimed to evaluate the effect of anticholinergic burden on anti-dementia treatment modification, delirium and mortality. We retrospectively analysed older adults (n = 25 825) who started a cholinesterase inhibitor during 2003-2011 from Korean National Health Insurance Service Senior Cohort Database. High anticholinergic burden was defined as an average daily Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) score of >3 during the first 3 months. We investigated the impact of high anticholinergic burden on the rate of treatment modification, delirium and mortality in comparison with minimal ACB (ACB score ≤1) in propensitymatched cohorts (N = 7438). Approximately 6.0% of patients with dementia were exposed to a high anticholinergic burden within the first three months of treatment. In high anticholinergic burden cohorts, significantly more patients experienced treatment modification (34.9% vs. 32.1%) or delirium (5.6% vs. 3.6%) and the mortality rate was also higher (16.8% vs. 14.1%) than controls. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that an average ACB score >3 within the first three months significantly increased the risk of treatment modification (hazard ratio (HR): 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.24), delirium (HR: 1.52, CI: 1.17-1.96) and mortality (HR: 1.23, CI: 1.06-1.41). This study showed that high anticholinergic burden negatively affected the treatment response to cholinesterase inhibitors and that an average ACB score >3 was an independent prognostic factor for delirium or mortality in dementia patients.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The dose response relationship of nine-year cumulative anticholinergic exposure and dementia onset was investigated using the Korean version anticholinergic burden scale (KABS) in comparison with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB). We also examined the effect of weak anticholinergics in the prediction of dementia. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted comprising 86,576 patients after 1:2 propensity score matching using the longitudinal national claims database. For cumulative anticholinergic burden estimation, average daily anticholinergic burden score during the 9 years prior to dementia onset was calculated using KABS and ACB and categorized as minimal, < 0.25; low, 0.25–1; intermediate, 1–2; and high, ≥ 2. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) between cumulative anticholinergic burden and incident dementia was estimated. Results Patients with high exposure according to KABS and ACB comprised 3.2 and 3.4% of the dementia cohort and 2.1 and 2.8% of the non-dementia cohort, respectively. Dose-response relationships were observed between anticholinergic burden and incident dementia. After adjusting covariates, compared with minimal exposure, patients with high exposure according to KABS and ACB had a significantly higher risk for incident dementia with aOR of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55–1.87) and 1.22 (CI 1.12–1.33), respectively. With the exclusion of weak anticholinergics, the association became stronger, i.e., 1.41 (CI 1.14–1.75) with ACB whereas the association became slightly weaker with KABS, i.e., 1.60 (CI 1.38–1.86). Conclusion This study confirmed the dose response relationship for cumulative anticholinergic burden measured using the Korean specific anticholinergic burden scale with incident dementia.