Time to relapse and tumor burden correlate with postrelapse outcome in osteosarcoma. Complete surgery is an essential component of curative second-line therapy. Chemotherapy, particularly chemotherapy with more than one agent, may contribute to limited improvements in outcome.
The German Society of Pediatric Oncology in 1981 initiated the Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study (CESS 81) using a four-drug combination of chemotherapy prior to definitive local control with surgery and/or radiation. From January 1, 1981 until February 28, 1985, 93 patients were registered at the trial office from 54 participating institutions in West Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. On February 1, 1987, 54 of 93 patients were disease-free. Using the Kaplan-Meier life table analysis, the estimated disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 60% at 36 months and 55% at 69 months. The median period of observation was 29 months, ranging from 22 months to 69 months. Twenty-one of 93 patients (23%) had local failure, 18 of 93 patients (19%) developed systemic metastases. The local failure rate was particularly high in patients treated with radiation and was reduced when radiation planning was centralized within the study based upon the extent of disease at diagnosis. Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors showed that tumor volume was a significant factor influencing prognosis. The estimated 3-year DFS rate was 80% for patients with small tumors (volume less than 100 ml) compared to 31% for patients with large tumors (volume greater than or equal to 100 ml). In patients who had surgery for local control, the histologic response to chemotherapy was analyzed on the surgical specimen and had a strong influence on survival: 79% DFS at 3 years for patients with less than 10% viable tumor (good responders) compared to 31% DFS for patients with more than 10% viable tumor (poor responders). Tumor load and responsiveness to chemotherapy are the two major factors influencing prognosis in patients with primary Ewing's sarcoma of bone.
Following observation of the predictive value of the histologic extent of tumor cell destruction after preoperative chemotherapy for metastasis-free survival (MFS) in osteosarcoma, a randomized study was undertaken with the aim of (1) sparing some patients the unpleasant side effects of highly toxic drugs like doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CPDD) by administering these drugs postoperatively only after poor response with a milder preoperative regimen, and (2) improving the prognosis of patients responding poorly to the initial treatment by use of a salvage chemotherapy postoperatively. The available patients were divided into two groups. Those in the study arm received a preoperative chemotherapy consisting of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and the triple drug combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD) and were switched to DOX/CPDD postoperatively in case of poor response. DOX/CPDD was used besides HDMTX for initial treatment in the control arm, and BCD alternatively with CPDD/ifosfamide (IFO) for postoperative salvage treatment. The response rate of the study arm was significantly inferior to the control arm (26% v 60%; P less than .001). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of poor responders after salvage chemotherapy also was poorest in the study arm (41%); it was unchanged in the control arm (53%) as compared with that of poor responders from the COSS-80 study without salvage chemotherapy (52%). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of good responders was 73% in the study arm, 79% in the control arm, and not significantly different from that of the COSS-80 study (84%), although postoperative chemotherapy of good responders had been markedly shortened as compared with the COSS-80 study. The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of the study arm as a whole was inferior to that of the control arm (49% v 68%; P less than .1) and also inferior to the COSS-80 study (68%; P less than .01), indicating a failure of the employed salvage strategy in general and especially of the effort to restrict the use of the very effective but highly toxic drugs DOX and CPDD to patients resistant to a less toxic initial treatment.
Initial tumor size is an important and easily obtainable prognostic factor in osteosarcoma and may serve as a basis for risk-adapted therapy. It is best represented by the absolute three-dimensional measure ATV. There is a cut-off point regarding the incidence of metastases at a tumor volume of approximately 150 cm3 as calculated from two-plane x-ray films.
From December 1979 to August 1982 158 patients were registered for an adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) study COSS -80. To compare the effect of cisplatin (CPL) to that of the drug combination bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD), patients were randomized to receive either drug(s) within a course of sequential multidrug CT including doxorubicin and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX). Definite surgery was done 10-18 weeks after the start of CT. Patients were randomized a second time to receive or not to receive fibroblast interferon in addition to CT beginning at week 16. At a median observation time of 19.5 months (range, 4-34 months), 116 (73%) of 158 patients were continuously disease-free (CDF). After exclusion of 42 patients because of some deviation in history and/or management, 86 (74%) of 116 patients actually were CDF with a 30-month calculated CDF-rate of 68%. There was no difference in CDF rates in the patients receiving BCD versus CPL or receiving interferon versus no interferon. Whereas, in comparison to the previous study COSS -77, the over-all increase in CDF rate does not reach statistical significance, it does, however, for the younger (less than or equal to 12 years) and for male patients, which is assumed to be the effect of increasing the methotrexate dose from 6 to 12 g/m2 in the COSS -80 study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.