Recently, pleiotropic benefits of incretin therapy beyond glycemic control have been reported. Although cancer is one of the main causes of death in diabetic patients, few reports describe the anticancer effects of incretin. Here, we examined the effect of the incretin drug exendin (Ex)-4, a GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist, on prostate cancer. In human prostate cancer tissue obtained from patients after they had undergone radical prostatectomy, GLP-1R expression colocalized with P504S, a marker of prostate cancer. In in vitro experiments, Ex-4 significantly decreased the proliferation of the prostate cancer cell lines LNCap, PC3, and DU145, but not that of ALVA-41. This antiproliferative effect depended on GLP-1R expression. In accordance with the abundant expression of GLP-1R in LNCap cells, a GLP-1R antagonist or GLP-1R knockdown with small interfering RNA abolished the inhibitory effect of Ex-4 on cell proliferation. Although Ex-4 had no effect on either androgen receptor activation or apoptosis, it decreased extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in LNCap cells. Importantly, Ex-4 attenuated in vivo prostate cancer growth induced by transplantation of LNCap cells into athymic mice and significantly reduced the tumor expression of P504S, Ki67, and phosphorylated ERK-MAPK. These data suggest that Ex-4 attenuates prostate cancer growth through the inhibition of ERK-MAPK activation.

No abstract

IntroductionRecently, the pleiotropic benefits of incretin-based therapy have been reported. We have previously reported that Exendin–4, a glucagon-like peptide–1 (GLP–1) receptor agonist, attenuates prostate cancer growth. Metformin is known for its anti-cancer effect. Here, we examined the anti-cancer effect of Exendin–4 and metformin using a prostate cancer model.MethodsProstate cancer cells were treated with Exendin–4 and/or metformin. Cell proliferation was quantified by growth curves and 5-bromo–2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) assay. TUNEL assay and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation were examined in LNCaP cells. For in vivo experiments, LNCaP cells were transplanted subcutaneously into the flank region of athymic mice, which were then treated with Exendin–4 and/or metformin. TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry were performed on tumors.ResultsExendin–4 and metformin additively decreased the growth curve, but not the migration, of prostate cancer cells. The BrdU assay revealed that both Exendin–4 and metformin significantly decreased prostate cancer cell proliferation. Furthermore, metformin, but not Exendin–4, activated AMPK and induced apoptosis in LNCaP cells. The anti-proliferative effect of metformin was abolished by inhibition or knock down of AMPK. In vivo, Exendin–4 and metformin significantly decreased tumor size, and further significant tumor size reduction was observed after combined treatment. Immunohistochemistry on tumors revealed that the P504S and Ki67 expression decreased by Exendin–4 and/or metformin, and that metformin increased phospho-AMPK expression and the apoptotic cell number.ConclusionThese data suggest that Exendin–4 and metformin attenuated prostate cancer growth by inhibiting proliferation, and that metformin inhibited proliferation by inducing apoptosis. Combined treatment with Exendin–4 and metformin attenuated prostate cancer growth more than separate treatments.

BackgroundRecently, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapy, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, has emerged as one of the most popular anti-diabetic therapies. Furthermore, GLP-1-based therapy has attracted increased attention not only for its glucose-lowering ability, but also for its potential as a tissue-protective therapy. In this study, we investigated the vascular-protective effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor, linagliptin, using vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).MethodsSix-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were divided into control (n =19) and linagliptin (3 mg/kg/day, n =20) treated groups. Endothelial denudation injuries were induced in the femoral artery at 8 weeks of age, followed by evaluation of neointima formation at 12 weeks. To evaluate cell proliferation of rat aortic smooth muscle cells, a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay was performed.ResultsLinagliptin treatment reduced vascular injury-induced neointima formation, compared with controls (p <0.05). In these non-diabetic mice, the body weight and blood glucose levels did not change after treatment with linagliptin. Linagliptin caused an approximately 1.5-fold increase in serum active GLP-1 concentration, compared with controls. In addition, the vascular injury-induced increase in the oxidative stress marker, urinary 8-OHdG, was attenuated by linagliptin treatment, though this attenuation was not statistically significant (p =0.064). Moreover, linagliptin did not change the serum stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) or the serum platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) concentration. However, linagliptin significantly reduced in vitro VSMC proliferation.ConclusionLinagliptin attenuates neointima formation after vascular injury and VSMC proliferation beyond the glucose-lowering effect.

The prevalence of primary aldosteronism (PA) is around 3-15% in patients with hypertension. Hypertension is a frequent complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) because of the close etiological relationship between these two diseases. However, the possibility of PA in patients with DM and hypertension is often overlooked and the prevalence of PA in patients with DM and hypertension in Japan is unknown. We enrolled 124 hospitalized patients with both DM and hypertension. PA was diagnosed according to the modified criteria for Japanese patients. We examined the prevalence of PA and compared clinical characteristics between patients with and without PA. In another analysis of 43 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PA, we compared the characteristics of patients with and without DM. Overall, 14/124 patients with DM and hypertension (11.3%) were diagnosed with PA. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the duration of DM was significantly shorter in the PA group. Fisher's direct probability test revealed that history of hypertension before the diagnosis of DM was a significant factor in patients with PA. Treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) did not affect the diagnosis of PA in these patients. Among 43 patients with PA, those with DM were significantly older and the delay to the diagnosis of PA was significantly longer compared with patients without DM. In conclusion, almost 10% of patients with DM and hypertension actually have PA. More extensive screening for PA is recommended in patients with DM and hypertension, regardless of the use of ARBs.