No abstract

No abstract

As the loss of free volatile compounds in aqueous protein systems is known to greatly influence the quality, and therefore the consumer acceptability, of protein‐containing foods, examination of the ability of different proteins to react with volatile flavour compounds as well as the nature of the interaction are of great interest to flavour chemists. It is generally believed that the affinity of flavour to proteins is a multi‐factor function related to protein source, protein conformation and stereochemistry of the flavour compound. However, the nature of protein‐flavour interactions has not been explicit. Less focus has been put on plant‐based proteins in comparison to animal proteins. With an increase in the use of plant‐based proteins in food systems, this article provides a fundamental review of the impact protein‐flavour interactions on flavour retention and release with a special emphasis on plant protein materials. Flavour‐food matrix interactions have been examined with a focus on how they influence flavour perception. Current knowledge on methodologies involved in protein‐flavour binding studies, binding mechanisms and factors affecting the interaction have been discussed. The implication of protein‐flavour interaction on protein functionality specifically protein thermal gelation properties has also been considered. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The rumen microbial complex adaptive mechanism invalidates various methane (CH4) mitigation strategies. Shifting the hydrogen flow toward alternative electron acceptors, such as propionate, was considered to be a meaningful mitigation strategy. A completely randomized design was applied in in vitro incubation to investigate the effects of replacing forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources (NFFS) in diets on methanogenesis, hydrogen metabolism, propionate production and the methanogenic and bacterial community. There are two treatments in the current study, CON (a basic total mixed ration) and TRT (a modified total mixed ration). The dietary treatments were achieved by partly replacing forage fiber with NFFS (wheat bran and soybean hull) to decrease forage neutral detergent fiber (fNDF) content from 24.0 to 15.8%, with the composition and inclusion rate of other dietary ingredients remaining the same in total mixed rations. The concentrations of CH4, hydrogen (H2) and volatile fatty acids were determined using a gas chromatograph. The archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes were sequenced by Miseq high-throughput sequencing and used to reveal the relative abundance of methanogenic and bacterial communities. The results revealed that the concentration of propionate was significantly increased, while the concentration of acetate and the acetate to propionate ratio were not affected by treatments. Compared with CON, the production of H2 increased by 8.45% and the production of CH4 decreased by 14.06%. The relative abundance of Methanomassiliicoccus was significantly increased, but the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter tended to decrease in TRT group. At the bacterial phylum level, the TRT group significantly decreased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and tended to increase the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes. The replacement of forage fiber with NFFS in diets can affect methanogenesis by shifting the hydrogen flow toward propionate, and part is directed to H2 in vitro. The shift was achieved by a substitution of Firmicutes by Bacteroidetes, another substitution of Methanobrevibacter by Methanomassiliicoccus. Theoretical predictions of displacements of H2 metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production was supported by the dietary intervention in vitro.