The removal of chromosomes from recipient oocytes is one of the key steps in nuclear transfer cloning. Although microtubule interrupters have been successfully used for oocyte enucleation, their potential side effect on oocyte developmental potential should be considered, and less harmful drugs should be explored for chemical-assisted enucleation. Based on our previous findings that any maturation promoting factor-activating agent induces ooplasmic protrusion without disrupting microtubules, we have studied the feasibility to use caffeine or MG132 for chemical-assisted enucleation. Experiments using goat oocytes showed that treatments for 30 min with 1-mM caffeine or 5-μM MG132-induced ooplasmic protrusions in about 85% of the oocytes, a percentage similar to that achieved with optimal demecolcine treatment. Rates of enucleation, cell fusion and in vitro blastulation were similar among caffeine, MG132, and demecolcine enucleation but significantly higher than blind aspiration. Furthermore, neither rates of pregnancy on days 90 and 120 nor the general rate of live births/embryos transferred differed significantly (p > 0.05) between caffeine and demecolcine enucleation. Although oocytes treated with caffeine did not retract protrusions until 2 h, many oocytes treated with MG132 withdrew protrusions as early as 0.5 h after treatment. The optimal treatment to induce ooplasmic protrusion in 75% pig oocytes was 8-mM caffeine for 60 min. Mouse oocytes responded poorly to demecolcine or caffeine with less than 40% forming inconspicuous protrusions following optimal treatments. It is concluded that caffeine can be used for enucleation of goat and pig oocytes with similar results as demecolcine, and live kids were born after caffeine-assisted enucleation.

The objective of this article was to study the developmental and hormonal regulation of cumulus expansion and secretion of cumulus expansion-enabling factor (CEEF) in goat follicles. M-199 medium was conditioned for 24 hr with cumulus-denuded oocytes (DOs), oocytectomized complexes (OOXs), or mural granulosa cells (MGCs) from goat follicles of different sizes. Mouse OOXs and eCG were added to culture drops of the conditioned medium and cumulus expansion was scored at 18 hr of culture to assess CEEF production. While mouse OOXs did not expand, goat OOXs underwent full cumulus expansion when cultured in nonconditioned eCG-supplemented M-199 medium. When cultured in nonconditioned medium containing 10% follicular fluid (FF) from goat medium (2-4 mm) and small (0.8-1.5 mm) follicles, 71-83% mouse OOXs expanded; but expansion rates decreased (P < 0.05) at either lower or higher FF concentrations. FF from large (5-6 mm) follicles did not support mouse OOX expansion at any concentrations. While medium conditioned with DOs from follicles of all the three sizes supported expansion of 80-90% mouse OOXs, medium conditioned with mature DOs had no effect. While cumulus cells from follicles of all the three sizes secreted CEEF in the absence of gonadotropins, MGCs from large follicles became gonadotropin dependent for CEEF production. Both FSH and LH stimulated CEEF production by large follicle MGCs, but FSH had a shorter half-life than LH to expand mouse OOXs. Few meiosis-incompetent goat oocytes from small follicles underwent cumulus expansion when cultured in medium conditioned with goat DOs or cocultured with goat COCs from medium follicles. It is concluded that (1) goat cumulus expansion is independent of the oocyte; (2) the limited CEEF activity in FF from large follicles was due mainly to the inability of MGCs in these follicles to secret the factor in absence or short supply of gonadotropins; (3) the cumulus expansion inability of the meiosis incompetent goat oocytes was due to the inability of their cumulus cells to respond to rather than to produce CEEF.

Studies suggest that oocyte cumulus expansion is regulated by both cumulus expansion-enabling factor (CEEF) and cumulus expansion-inhibiting factors (CEIF). Many reports on CEEF have appeared, but CEIF has rarely been studied. By cumulus expansion assays using mouse cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) and oocytectomized complexes, the present study demonstrated that whereas follicular fluid (FF) from medium (diameter, 2-4 mm) goat follicles contained both CEEF and CEIF activities, FF from large (diameter, 5-6 mm) abattoir or large (diameter, 5-7 mm) follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-stimulated follicles contained neither. FF from (diameter, 5-7 mm) human chorionic gonadotropin-stimulated follicles showed CEEF but not CEIF activity. Whereas medium conditioned with cumulus or mural granulosa cells from medium goat follicles contained only CEEF activity, theca cell-conditioned medium (CM) showed both CEEF and CEIF activities. Whereas 0.01 mg/ml of heparin efficiently inhibited cumulus expansion of mouse COCs in vitro, FF from large follicles that showed no CEIF activity contained much higher concentrations (0.23-0.25 mg/ml) of heparin. None of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) tested inhibited cumulus expansion of goat COCs. Among the follicles observed, only FF from medium goat follicles contained a linoleic acid (LA) level sufficient to inhibit cumulus expansion of both mouse and goat COCs in vitro. CM contained some amount of GAGs but no LA. Taken together, the results suggest that 1) the FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) surges before ovulation promote cumulus expansion by down-regulating CEIF and up-regulating CEEF activity, respectively; 2) GAGs are not the CEIF in goat follicles; and 3) LA has CEIF activity but additional factors must be involved, because CM that showed high CEIF activity contained no LA.