Thanks to the support of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide a navigation positioning solution that, in the absence of satellite signals (in tunnels, forest and urban areas), allows the continuous positioning of a moving object (air, land and sea). Passenger and freight trains must, for safety reasons, comply with several formal navigation requirements, particularly those that concern the minimum acceptable accuracy for determining their position. Depending on the type of task performed by the train (positioning a vehicle on a route, stopping at a turnout, stopping at a platform, monitoring the movement of rolling stock, etc.), the train must have positioning systems that can determine its position with sufficient accuracy (1–10 m, p = 0.95) to perform the tasks in question. A wide range of INS/GNSS equipment is currently available, ranging from very costly to simple solutions based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), which, in addition to an inertial unit, use one or two GNSS receivers. The paper presents an assessment of the accuracy of both types of solutions by testing them simultaneously in dynamic measurements. The research, due to the costs and logistics complexity, was made using a passenger car. The surveys were carried out in a complex way, because the measurement route was travelled three times at four different speeds: 40 km/h, 80 km/h, 100 km/h and 120 km/h on seven representative test sections with diverse land development. In order to determine the positioning accuracy of INS devices, two precise GNSS geodetic receivers (2 cm accuracy, p = 0.95) were used as a reference positioning system. The measurements demonstrated that only INS/GNSS systems based on two receivers can meet the requirements of most railway applications related to rail navigation, and since a solution with a single GNSS receiver has a much lower positioning accuracy, it is not suitable for many railway applications. It is noted that considerable differences between the standards defining the navigation requirements for railway applications. For example, INS/GNSS systems based on two receivers meet the vast majority of the expectations specified in the Report on Rail User Needs and Requirements. However, according to the Federal Radionavigation Plan (FRP), it cannot be used in any railway application.

The rapid development of satellite navigation and timing technologies and the broad availability of user equipment and applications has dramatically changed the world over the last 20 years. It took 38 years from the launch of the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, (October 4, 1957) to the day NAVSTAR GPS became fully operational (July 17, 1995). In the next 20 years user equipment became widely available at the consumer level, and 10 global and regional satellite systems were partially or fully deployed. These highly precise signals provided free to the user have been incorporated by clever engineers into virtually every technology. At the same time interference with these signals (spoofing and jamming) have become a significant day to day problem in many societies and pose a significant threat to critical infrastructure. This paper provides information on the current status and development of navigation satellite systems based on data provided by the systemsʹ administrators. It also provides information on Loran/eLoran, a system which many nations have selected as a complement and backup for satellite navigation systems.

Mobile Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements carried out on the railway consist of using satellite navigation systems to determine the track geometry of a moving railway vehicle on a given route. Their purposes include diagnostics, stocktaking, and design work in railways. The greatest advantage of this method is the ability to perform measurements in a unified and coherent spatial reference system, which effectively enables the combining of design and construction works, as well as their implementation by engineering teams of diverse specialties. In the article, we attempted to assess the impact of using three types of work mode for a GNSS geodetic network [Global Positioning System (GPS), GPS/Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) and GPS/GLONASS/Galileo] on positioning availability at three accuracy levels: 1 cm, 3 cm and 10 cm. This paper presents a mathematical model that enables the calculation of positioning availability at these levels. This model was also applied to the results of the measurement campaign performed by five GNSS geodetic receivers, made by a leading company in the field. Measurements with simultaneous position recording and accuracy assessment were taken separately on the same route for three types of receiver settings: GPS, GPS/GLONASS and GPS/GLONASS/Galileo in an urban area typical of a medium-sized city. The study has shown that applying a two-system solution (GPS/GLONASS) considerably increases the availability of high-precision coordinates compared to a single-system solution (GPS), whereas the measurements with three systems (GPS/GLONASS/Galileo) negligibly increase the availability compared to a two-system solution (GPS/GLONASS).

When used at sea, satellite compasses are capable of determining the course of a sailing vessel with high accuracy. It is difficult to verify the accuracy declared by the device manufacturer under such conditions, as it is difficult to define a reliable reference. This study analyses the accuracy of the satellite compass in an urban setting, with the satellite signal being obscured to various extents. It is an important point in the study to refer the measurement results to a reference route, which is the axis of a tramway track, determined by the precise GNSS RTK method. The measurement data were processed in the original software developed by the authors. The results demonstrate a high 2D positioning accuracy with low height determination accuracy. The course determination errors exceed the limit values declared by the manufacturer. However, specific measurement conditions must be taken into account, which differ considerably from the typical applications of a satellite compass.

No abstract