No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARY Postprandial pancreatic secretion results from the interaction of neural and hormonal factors but their contribution to the net postprandial secretion is unknown. Recent description of highly specific and potent cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor antagonists allows the determination of the physiological role of CCK in the postprandial pancreatic secretion. In six dogs with chronic pancreatic fistulae, the blockade of CCK receptors by non-peptidal agent (L-364 718) caused little change in basal pancreatic secretion, but decreased significantly (p<005) by about 60% the pancreatic protein response to meat feeding and virtually abolished the pancreatic responses to CCK-8 and bombesin. The pancreatic protein responses to pentagastrin, reaching about 37% of CCK maximum, was also significantly reduced but this effect was less pronounced than that observed in tests with CCK-8 or bombesin stimulation. In contrast, cholinergically stimulated pancreatic secretion, reaching about 40% of CCK maximum, was unaffected by L-364 718. Cholecystokinin antagonism also failed to affect the postprandial and bombesin induced increments in plasma CCK and gastrin concentrations, but significantly reduced the PP responses to CCK-8 bombesin and meat feeding possibly as a result of the removal ofthe CCK mediated release of PP. We conclude that CCK plays a crucial role in the mediation of the postprandial and bombesin induced pancreatic secretion and in the PP release.Although it is generally accepted that the pancreatic secretion is controlled by interacting neural and hormonal mechanisms, the controversy continues over the relative contribution of these mechanisms in interdigestive and postprandial secretion.'2The old suggestion that the reflex vagal cholinergic mechanisms play a considerable role in the postprandial pancreatic secretion2' has been undermined by recent evidence that antral gastrin"5 and intestinal

Several studies have shown that type IV fibrocytes, located in the spiral ligament, degenerate first after noise exposure. Interestingly, this is the region where Coch expression is most abundant. As it is suggested that cochlin plays a role in our innate immune system, our goal is to investigate hearing thresholds and inner ear inflammation after noise exposure in Coch knockout (Coch−/−) mice compared to Coch wildtype (Coch+/+) mice. Animals were randomly allocated to a noise exposure group and a control group. Vestibular and auditory testing was performed at 48 h and one week after noise exposure. Whole mount staining and cryosectioning of the cochlea was performed in order to investigate hair cells, spiral ganglion neurons, inner ear inflammation, Coch expression and fibrocyte degeneration. Hearing assessment revealed that Coch+/+ mice had significantly larger threshold shifts than Coch−/− mice after noise exposure. We were unable to identify any differences in hair cells, neurons, fibrocytes and influx of macrophages in the inner ear between both groups. Interestingly, Coch expression was significantly lower in the group exposed to noise. Our results indicate that the absence of Coch has a protective influence on hearing thresholds after noise exposure, but this is not related to reduced inner ear inflammation in the knockout.

No abstract

This study was designed to compare gastric antisecretory effects of telenzepine, a new antimuscarinic agent, with those of pirenzepine and atropine in dogs. None of these antimuscarinics affected gastric acid secretion induced by histamine but all of them caused a dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion from the gastric fistula (GF) and Heidenhain pouches (HP) stimulated by pentagastrin and bethanechol, telenzepine being 5–9 times more potent than pirenzepine and equipotent with atropine. All antimuscarinics were also effective inhibitors of acid responses to sham feeding and ordinary feeding. The inhibitory effects of telenzepine and pirenzepine were not accompanied by any major alterations in plasma gastrin or somatostatin but those of atropine were related to significant increase in plasma gastrin and to significant decrease in plasma somatostatin levels, suggesting the involvement of M2 receptors in the cholinergic control of these hormones. All three antimuscarinics were effective inhibitors of pepsin secretion induced both from the GF and HP by all secretagogues used. Neither telenzepine nor pirenzepine administered in various doses affected the heart rate while atropine caused a significant increase in heart rate confirming that the former agents are selective M1 receptor antagonists. This study provides evidence that telenzepine is more potent than pirenzepine in the inhibition of gastric secretion induced by pentagastrin, bethanechol, sham-feeding and ordinary feeding and that, unlike atropine, it does not increase plasma gastrin responses to meat feeding. In fact, telenzepine and pirenzepine alike reduced plasma gastrin concentrations under these conditions. No influence of these antimuscarinics on plasma somatostatin levels was observed.

No abstract