The crystal structure of the peroxisome enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase bound to its targeting receptor Pex5p explains why even minor fold defects prevent targeting of the enzyme and cause kidney disease.

Background: MASP-1 is considered as auxiliary, whereas MASP-2 is considered as a key protease in lectin-pathway activation. Results: MASP-1 inhibitor SGMI-1 and MASP-2 inhibitor SGMI-2 completely block lectin pathway activation; the MASP-2⅐SGMI-2 complex reveals structural plasticity. Conclusion: MASP-1 is a key component; MASP-2 functions through induced fit or conformational selection. Significance: The lectin pathway activation model is incorrect. SGMIs revolutionize studying and enable regulating the lectin pathway.

The protein Pex19p functions as a receptor and chaperone of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs). The crystal structure of the folded C-terminal part of the receptor reveals a globular domain that displays a bundle of three long helices in an antiparallel arrangement.Complementary functional experiments, using a range of truncated Pex19p constructs, show that the structured a-helical domain binds PMP-targeting signal (mPTS) sequences with about 10 lM affinity. Removal of a conserved N-terminal helical segment from the mPTS recognition domain impairs the ability for mPTS binding, indicating that it forms part of the mPTS-binding site. Pex19p variants with mutations in the same sequence segment abolish correct cargo import. Our data indicate a divided N-terminal and C-terminal structural arrangement in Pex19p, which is reminiscent of a similar division in the Pex5p receptor, to allow separation of cargo-targeting signal recognition and additional functions.

No abstract

Peroxisomes entirely rely on the import of their proteome across the peroxisomal membrane. Recognition efficiencies of peroxisomal proteins vary by more than 1000-fold, but the molecular rationale behind their subsequent differential import and sorting has remained enigmatic.Using the protein cargo alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase as a model, an unexpected increase from 34 to 80% in peroxisomal import efficiency of a single-residue mutant has been discovered. By high-resolution structural analysis, we found that it is the recognition receptor PEX5 that adapts its conformation for high-affinity binding rather than the cargo protein signal motif as previously thought. During receptor recognition, the binding cavity of the receptor shrinks to one third of its original volume. This process is impeded in the wild-type protein cargo because of a bulky side chain within the recognition motif, which blocks contraction of the PEX5 binding cavity. Our data provide a new insight into direct protein import efficiency by removal rather than by addition of an apparent specific sequence signature that is generally applicable to peroxisomal matrix proteins and to other receptor recognition processes.

Atomic resolution (

Folded and functional proteins destined for translocation from the cytosol into the peroxisomal matrix are recognized by two different peroxisomal import receptors, Pex5p and Pex7p. Both cargo-loaded receptors dock on the same translocon components, followed by cargo release and receptor recycling, as part of the complete translocation process. Recent structural and functional evidence on the Pex5p receptor has provided insight on the molecular requirements of specific cargo recognition, while the remaining processes still remain largely elusive. Comparison of experimental structures of Pex5p and a structural model of Pex7p reveal that both receptors are built by ring-like arrangements with cargo binding sites, central to the respective structures. Although, molecular insight into the complete peroxisomal translocon still remains to be determined, emerging data allow to deduce common molecular principles that may hold for other translocation systems as well.

Background: Peroxisomal proteins are recognized in the cytosol by the import receptor Pex5p. Results: Photo-cross-linking and mass spectrometry reveal the binding interface of Pex5p and its cargo protein Pcs60p. Conclusion: Pex5p-cargo interaction extends beyond signal sequence recognition and exhibits a bivalent binding mode. Significance: These data indicate a two-step concept of peroxisomal cargo recognition with initial tethering and subsequent lock-in.