The authors present a retrospective review of their experience with 85 cases using the pi procedure to correct sagittal synostosis. A male preponderance of four to one was recognized in this group. Sixty-five infants underwent computerized tomography scanning of the head prior to surgery; these scans revealed unexpected intracranial pathology in 5% of cases. Surgical complications included three intraoperative dural lacerations. All children received blood transfusions with no complications. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent in 53%, good in 43%, and poor in 4% of cases. One patient required reoperation. All poor outcomes were in infants who were younger than 8 weeks of age at the time of surgery and who underwent a "reverse pi" procedure. Most of the excellent outcomes occurred in infants who were between 3 and 6 months of age at the time of surgery. Although more extensive than strip craniectomy, the pi procedure can be accomplished with minimal morbidity. In the authors' opinion, the pi procedure provides better immediate and long-term cosmetic results than synostectomy alone.
Although pediatric neurosurgeons traditionally have been trained to perform a sagittal synostectomy for the treatment of sagittal synostosis, numerous articles advocating modifications of this procedure or more complex cranial vault reconstructions point our the inadequacies of strip craniectomy in providing optimal short- and long-term cosmesis. This review addresses the major arguments for and against performing complex cranioplasties for sagittal synostosis, as well as issues regarding timing of surgery, mortality and morbidity, increased need for blood transfusion, and increased expense. The authors support the contention that for the majority of infants with sagittal synostosis, complex calvarial vault reconstruction provides a better outcome with little increase in operative risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.