Background:
Developmentally supportive environments are known to improve medical outcomes for hospitalized neonates and are considered the overarching philosophy for practice in the neonatal setting. Developmental rounds are a strategy incorporated by multidisciplinary teams to support development within and beyond the neonatal unit. Typically, they consist of bedside consultations and individualized developmentally supportive recommendations for families and clinicians. Globally, the use of developmental rounds has been described since the early 1990s. They are viewed as a measure to counter some of the barriers to developmental care implementation while buffering against the effect of an intensive care admission. To date, their use in the surgical neonatal intensive care unit (sNICU) has been minimally reported in literature.
Purpose:
This article describes the focus and work of a developmental round team and strategy in the sNICU.
Method:
A retrospective audit of developmental round key performance criteria undertaken over a 4-year period (2015-2018).
Findings/Results:
More than 300 developmental consults and 2000 individualized developmental recommendations occurred annually. Parental presence during the developmental round increased by 10%, from 48% to 58%, during the audit period.
Implications for Practice/Implications for Research:
Literature has supported the use of developmental round interventions; however, minimal data have been reported to date. This article provides retrospective audit data of a developmental round intervention in the sNICU with a focus on data over 4 years to highlight key areas, including the structure and process, recommended educational standards for team members, and parental engagement, as key markers for developmental round efficacy. Future research should focus on the link between the developmental round intervention and long-term neonatal outcomes.
Aim
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common birth defects affecting around 1:100 infants. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine impact of growth on neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with CHD.
Methods
Studies that reported association of growth with developmental outcomes in infants with CHD who had surgery, were included. The search strategy was prospectively registered. Relevant studies were identified by electronic searches. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from their earliest date to February 2022.
Results
Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Choice of growth measures, developmental assessment tools and timing of assessment varied widely precluding conduct of a meta‐analysis. Seventeen studies reported on infants who had cardio‐pulmonary bypass. Birth weight was reported in thirteen studies and was associated with adverse outcome in nine. Head circumference at birth and later predicted developmental outcomes in five. Impaired postnatal growth was associated with adverse developmental outcome in seven studies.
Conclusion
Growth in infants with congenital heart disease, specifically single ventricle physiology can predict adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Included studies showed significant clinical heterogeneity. Uniformity should be agreed by various data registries with routine prospective collection of growth and developmental data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.