An extended multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) scheme applicable to the Brucella, an expanding genus that includes zoonotic pathogens that severely impact animal and human health across large parts of the globe, was developed. The scheme, which extends a previously described nine locus scheme by examining sequences at 21 independent genetic loci in order to increase discriminatory power, was applied to a globally and temporally diverse collection of over 500 isolates representing all 12 known Brucella species providing an expanded and detailed understanding of the population genetic structure of the group. Over 100 sequence types (STs) were identified and analysis of data provided insights into both the global evolutionary history of the genus, suggesting that early emerging Brucella abortus lineages might be confined to Africa while some later lineages have spread worldwide, and further evidence of the existence of lineages with restricted host or geographical ranges. The relationship between biovar, long used as a crude epidemiological marker, and genotype was also examined and showed decreasing congruence in the order Brucella suis > B. abortus > Brucella melitensis. Both the previously described nine locus scheme and the extended 21 locus scheme have been made available at http://pubmlst.org/brucella/ to allow the community to interrogate existing data and compare with newly generated data.

Background: Brucellosis, caused by members of the genus Brucella, remains one of the world's major zoonotic diseases. Six species have classically been recognised within the family Brucella largely based on a combination of classical microbiology and host specificity, although more recently additional isolations of novel Brucella have been reported from various marine mammals and voles. Classical identification to species level is based on a biotyping approach that is lengthy, requires extensive and hazardous culturing and can be difficult to interpret. Here we describe a simple and rapid approach to identification of Brucella isolates to the species level based on realtime PCR analysis of species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were identified following a robust and extensive phylogenetic analysis of the genus.

SummaryThe ubiquitous and highly conserved RecA protein is generally expressed from a single promoter, which is regulated by LexA in conjunction with RecA. We show here using transcriptional fusions to a reporter gene that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA gene is expressed from two promoters. Although one promoter is clearly regulated in the classical way, the other remains DNA damage inducible in the absence of RecA or when LexA binding is prevented. These observations demonstrate convincingly for the first time that there is a novel mechanism of DNA damage induction in M. tuberculosis that is independent of LexA and RecA.

The recA gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is unusual in that it is expressed from two promoters, one of which, P1, is DNA damage inducible independently of LexA and RecA, while the other, P2, is regulated by LexA in the classical way (E. O. Davis, B. Springer, K. K. Gopaul, K. G. Papavinasasundaram, P. Sander, and E. C. Böttger, Mol. Microbiol. 46:791-800, 2002). In this study we characterized these two promoters in more detail. Firstly, we localized the promoter elements for each of the promoters, and in so doing we identified a mutation in each promoter which eliminates promoter activity. Interestingly, a motif with similarity to Escherichia coli 70 ؊35 elements but located much closer to the ؊10 element is important for optimal expression of P1, whereas the sequence at the ؊35 location is not. Secondly, we found that the sequences flanking the promoters can have a profound effect on the expression level directed by each of the promoters. Finally, we examined the contribution of each of the promoters to recA expression and compared their kinetics of induction following DNA damage.The protein RecA is very important for a number of processes related to DNA metabolism and has been best characterized in Escherichia coli. It is a central component of recombination, whether by the RecBCD pathway or the RecF pathway (20). In either case, RecA forms a nucleoprotein filament on regions of single-stranded DNA and by its ability to simultaneously bind double-stranded DNA performs the search for homologous sequences. Strand exchange then initiates the actual process of recombination. RecA also has a key regulatory role in the response to DNA damage, owing to the ability of the nucleoprotein filament formed on regions of single-stranded DNA to stimulate the cleavage of the repressor protein LexA (15,25). Under normal conditions, LexA binds to a specific sequence upstream of the genes it regulates, which include recA and lexA themselves, and inhibits their expression (4, 26); however, following cleavage, the fragments of LexA formed do not effectively bind to this site (3), permitting increased transcription. As well as regulating the expression of other genes following DNA damage, RecA has a direct role in recombinational DNA repair which is particularly important for replication restart following the collapse of a replication fork, for example, when it reaches a damaged segment of DNA (7). Although the majority of studies on RecA function have been conducted with the E. coli protein, RecA is highly conserved across bacterial species (18, 34). Thus, it appears most likely that it performs equivalent functions in all bacteria.In many species of bacteria, expression of RecA is induced following DNA damage. In the majority of these cases this process is regulated by a homolog of LexA, as in E. coli (12), although the sequence to which the LexA homolog binds varies between species. In both E. coli and the well-studied grampositive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, recA is expressed from a single promoter (6, 39). It was recently ...

Introduction: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that has a significant economic, social and public health impact in many parts of the world. The causative agents are members of the genus Brucella currently comprising 11 species and with an expanding known host range in recent years. Case presentation: One of a pair of White’s tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) developed skin lesions from which a pure growth of a haemolytic organism was obtained. The isolate was identified as Brucella melitensis by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, although the colony morphology was inconsistent with this identification. Applying the classical biotyping approach used to subdivide members of the genus Brucella, the isolate did not correspond to any known Brucella sp. However, PCR targeting of genes specific for members of the genus Brucella was strongly positive and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a close relationship with extant Brucella spp. In order to place the isolate more accurately, a multilocus sequencing approach was applied, which confirmed that the isolate represented a novel member of the emerging ‘atypical’ Brucella group, which includes isolates from human disease, from rodents and, more recently, reported isolations from frogs in Germany. Conclusion: This case represents the first report of isolation of a Brucella sp. from frogs outside Germany and suggests that these isolates may be widespread. Whilst there is no evidence to date that these isolates represent a zoonotic threat, the association of other ‘atypical’ Brucella sp. with human disease suggests that appropriate measures should be taken to avoid unnecessary contact with potentially infected amphibians until the zoonotic potential of this group is better understood.