Macrophages are resident myeloid cells in the gingival tissue which control homeostasis and play a pivotal role in orchestrating the immune response in periodontitis. Cell heterogeneity and functional phenotypes of macrophage subpopulations in periodontitis remain elusive. Here, we isolated gingival tissue from periodontitis‐affected and healthy sites of patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We then used single‐cell RNA‐sequencing (scRNA‐seq) to define the heterogeneity of tissue‐resident macrophages in gingival tissue in health vs. periodontitis. scRNA‐seq demonstrated an unforeseen gene expression heterogeneity among macrophages in periodontitis and showed transcriptional and signaling heterogeneity of identified subsets in an independent cohort of patients with periodontitis and T2DM. Our bioinformatic inferences indicated divergent expression profiles in macrophages driven by transcriptional regulators CIITA, RELA, RFX5, and RUNX2. Macrophages in periodontitis expressed both pro‐inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory markers and their polarization was not mutually exclusive. The majority of macrophages in periodontitis expressed the monocyte lineage marker CD14, indicating their bone marrow lineage. We also found high expression and activation of RELA, a subunit of the NF‐κB transcription factor complex, in gingival macrophages of periodontitis patients with T2DM. Our data suggested that heterogeneity and hyperinflammatory activation of macrophages may be relevant to the pathogenesis and outcomes of periodontitis, and may be further augmented in patients with T2DM.
Background and Objectives: Aldose Reductase (AR), a polyol pathway enzyme that mediates diabetic complications is implicated in tumour development and progression. This study was undertaken to determine whether gedunin, a neem limonoid prevents the hallmarks of cancer by inhibiting AR and the associated downstream PI3K/Akt/mTOR/ERK/NF-κB signalling axis in the SCC131 oral cancer cell line. Methods: The expression of AR and key molecules involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, invasion and angiogenesis was analysed by qRT-PCR, and immunoblotting. ROS generation and cell cycle were analysed by FACS. Alamar blue assay and scratch assay were used to evaluate cell proliferation and migration in the endothelial cell line Eahy926. Results: Gedunin and the AR inhibitor epalrestat inhibited AR expression and ROS generation. Cell cycle arrest at G1/S was associated with cell death by autophagy with subsequent switch over to apoptosis. Furthermore, hypoxia-induced cell migration was inhibited in Eahy926 cells with downregulation of pro-invasive and proangiogenic proteins in SCC131 as well as Eahy926 cells. Co-inactivation of Akt and ERK was coupled with abrogation of IKK/NF-κB signaling. However, the combination of gedunin and epalrestat was more effective than single agents. Conclusion: Inhibition of AR-mediated ROS signalling may be a key mechanism by which gedunin and epalrestat exert their anticancer effects. Our results provide compelling evidence that the combination of gedunin and epalrestat modulates expression of key oncogenic signalling kinases and transcription factors primarily by influencing phosphorylation and subcellular localisation. AR inhibitors such as gedunin and epalrestat are novel candidate agents for cancer prevention and therapy.
BackgroundUnderstanding the role and potential therapeutic targeting of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) is crucial to developing new biomarkers and therapeutic strategies for cancer immunotherapies. The epigenetic reader SP140 has emerged as a master regulator of macrophage transcriptional programs; however, its role in the signaling of TAMs and response to immunotherapy has not been investigated.MethodsWe evaluated the correlation between SP140 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) TAMs and clinical outcomes. We also used complementary bioinformatics and experimental approaches to study the association of SP140 expression with tumor mutation burden, patient survival, immunogenic signature of tumors, and signaling of TAMs. SP140 overexpression or knockdown was implemented to identify the role of SP140 in downstream signaling and production of inflammatory cytokine and chemokines. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and analysis of assay of transposase accessible chromatin sequencing data were used to demonstrate the direct binding of SP140 on the promoters of STAT1. Finally, correlation of SP140 with immune cell infiltrates and response to immune-checkpoint blockade in independent cohorts of HNSCC, metastatic melanoma, and melanoma was assessed.ResultsWe found that SP140 is highly expressed in TAMs across many cancer types, including HNSCCs. Interestingly, higher expression of SP140 in the tumors was associated with higher tumor mutation burden, improved survival, and a favorable response to immunotherapy. Tumors with high SP140 expression showed enrichment of inflammatory response and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) pathways in both pan-cancer analysis and HNSCC-specific analysis. Mechanistically, SP140 negatively regulates transcription and phosphorylation of STAT1 and induces IFN-γ signaling. Activating SP140 in macrophages and TAMs induced the proinflammatory macrophage phenotype, increased the antitumor activity of macrophages, and increased the production of IFN-γ and antitumor cytokines and chemokines including interleukin-12 and CXCL10. SP140 expression provided higher sensitivity and specificity to predict antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy response compared with programmed death-ligand 1 in HNSCCs and lung cancer. In metastatic melanoma, higher levels of SP140 were associated with a durable response to immunotherapy, higher immune score estimates, high infiltrations of CD8+T cells, and inflammatory TAMs.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that SP140 could serve as both a therapeutic target and a biomarker to identify immunotherapy responders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.