Effect of middle-ear pathology on high-frequency ear-canal reflectance measurements in the frequency and time domains AIP Conference Proceedings 1703, 060003 (2015) Abstract. The mechanisms of bone conduction (BC) hearing, which is important in diagnosis and treatment of hearing loss, are poorly understood, thus limiting use of BC. Recently, information gained by intracochlear pressure measurements has revealed that the mechanisms of sound transmission that drive pressure differences across the cochlear partition are different for air conduction (AC) than for round-window stimulation. Presently we are utilizing these pressure measurement techniques in fresh human cadaveric preparations to improve our understanding of sound transmission during BC. We have modified our technique of intracochlear pressure measurements for the special requirements of studying BC, as bone vibration poses challenges for making these measurements. Fiberoptic pressure sensors were inserted through cochleostomies in both scalae at the base of the cochlea. The cochleostomies were then tightly sealed with the sensors in place to prevent air and fluid leaks, and the sensors were firmly secured to ensure uniform vibrations of the sensors and surrounding bone of the cochlea. The velocity of the stapes, round window and cochlear promontory were each measured with laser Doppler vibrometry simultaneous to the intracochlear pressure measurements. To understand the contribution of middle-ear inertia, the incudo-stapedial joint was severed. Subsequently, the stapes footplate was fixed (similar to the consequence of otosclerosis) to determine the effect of removing the mobility of the oval window. BC stimulation resulted in pressure in scala vestibuli that was significantly higher than in scala tympani, such that the differential pressure across the partition -the cochlear drive input -was similar to scala vestibuli pressure (and overall, similar to the relationship found during AC but different than during round-window stimulation). After removing the inertial mass of the middle ear, with only the stapes attached to the flexible oval window, all pressures dropped similarly (10 dB). Fixing the oval window resulted in further drop of all pressures (10 dB more). These decreases in pressure occurred around 1-4 kHz, consistent with clinical observations of Carhart's notch.
Background: After cochlear implant (CI) surgery, some patients experience vertigo, dizziness and/or deficits in vestibulo-ocular reflexes. However, little is known about the effect of CI surgery on balance control. Therefore, we examined differences in stance and gait balance control before versus after CI surgery. Methods: Balance control of 30 CI patients (mean age 59, SD 15.4 years), receiving a first unilateral CI surgery, was measured preoperatively and postoperatively 1 month after the initial implant stimulation (2 months after surgery). Trunk sway was measured during 14 stance and gait tests using an angular-velocity system mounted at lumbar vertebrae 1–3. Results: For pre- versus postoperative comparisons across all 30 patients, a nonsignificant worsening in balance control was observed. Significant changes were, however, found within subgroups. Patients younger than 60 years of age had a significant worsening of an overall balance control index (BCI) after CI surgery (p = 0.008), as did patients with a normal BCI preoperatively (p = 0.005). Gait task measures comprising the BCI followed a similar pattern, but stance control was unchanged. In contrast, patients over 60 years or with a pathological BCI preoperatively showed improved tandem walking postoperatively (p = 0.0235). Conclusion: Across all CI patients, CI surgery has a minor effect on balance control 2 months postoperatively. However, for patients younger than 60 years and those with normal balance control preoperatively, balance control worsened for gait indicating the need for preoperative counseling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.