This study investigates the relationship between organizational culture and corporate sustainable development (CSD).Organizational culture is measured based on the four types of culture of the competing values framework: i) clan, ii) adhocracy, iii) hierarchy and iv) market type, while CSD was examined as a construct of i) economic, ii) environmental and iii) social dimension. The survey on medium-and large-sized firms in Greece reveals that adhocracy and hierarchy type of organizational culture have a significant effect on CSD. Specifically, adhocracy type is positively related to the environmental dimension of CSD, while hierarchy type is positively related to the economic dimension of CSD.
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate sustainable development (CSD). In recent years, the intensity of the connection between cultural values and SD has been a heavily debated topic. Subsequently, this issue has gained considerable attention from management academics.
Design/methodology/approach
To shed light on this phenomenon, this study uses econometric techniques (linear regression) and conducts a survey of business executives in medium and large firms to search for evidence that cultural values significantly affect perceptions of CSD.
Findings
The findings indicate that forward-looking executives who envision themselves as individuals rather than members of a group exhibit more positive perceptions of CSD practices than the rest.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical assessment of cultural values on the perceptions of the three aspects (economic, social and environmental) of CSD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.