Complex wounds with exposed critical structures such as tendon and bone are a conundrum in wound management, especially in the setting where the patient is not a suitable candidate for flap surgery. While the individual use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver (PROMOGRAN PRISMA) dressing has been described in the literature, there are little data on the efficacy of their combined use. In this study, we describe a novel technique of combining the use of NPWT and ORC/collagen/silver dressings to manage complex wound beds as an alternative management option for patients not suitable for reconstructive flap surgery. This technique was performed in a series of 37 patients with complex lower‐extremity wounds that were not healing with conventional NPWT alone. All patients had open wounds with exposed critical structures that were difficult to manage, such as exposed tendon, bone, deep crevices, and joint. Successful coverage of exposed critical structures was achieved in 89% of patients, and coverage was achieved within 28 days of combination therapy in 82% of these patients, without any complications. The novel technique of combining ORC/collagen/silver dressing and NPWT provides a useful option in the armamentarium of a reconstructive surgeon dealing with difficult complex lower‐extremity wounds.
Objective: The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is ubiquitous in the management of complex wounds. Extending beyond the traditional utility of NPWT, it has been used after reconstructive flap surgery in a few case series. The authors sought to investigate the outcomes of NPWT use on flap reconstruction in a case–control study. Method: Patients who underwent flap reconstruction between November 2017 and January 2020 were reviewed for inclusion in the study, and divided into an NPWT group and a control group. For patients in the NPWT group, NPWT was used directly over the locoregional flap immediately post-surgery for 4–7 days, before switching to conventional dressings. The control group used conventional dressing materials immediately post-surgery. Outcome measures such as flap necrosis, surgical site infections (SSIs), wound dehiscence as well as time to full functional recovery and hospitalisation duration were evaluated. Results: Of the 138 patients who underwent flap reconstruction, 37 who had free flap reconstructions were excluded, and 101 patients were included and divided into two groups: 51 patients in the NPWT group and 50 patients in the control group. Both groups had similar patient demographics, and patient and wound risk factors for impaired wound healing. Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between flap necrosis, SSIs, wound dehiscence, hospitalisation duration as well as functional recovery rates. Cost analysis showed that the use of NPWT over flaps for the first seven postoperative days may potentially be more cost effective in our setting. Conclusion: In this study, the appropriate use of NPWT over flaps was safe and efficacious in the immediate postoperative setting, and was not inferior to the conventional dressings used for reconstructive flap surgery. The main benefits of NPWT over flaps include better exudate management, oedema reduction and potential cost savings. Further studies would be required to ascertain any further benefit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.