Summary
The extension of the waste input‐output (WIO) model to analyze households' sustainable consumption patterns is presented in this article. We estimate direct and indirect emission loads induced by household consumption by the WIO model. The WIO model is much more suitable for the analysis of sustainable consumption than the conventional input‐output model because it can deal with the disposal stage of consumed goods as well as the purchase and use stages. A simple method for evaluating income rebound effects is also introduced. As indicators of environmental loads, we estimate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and landfill consumption induced by household consumption. The model is applied to some typical sustainable consumption scenarios: shifting transportation modes from a private car to public transportation, the longer use of household electric appliances, and eating at restaurants instead of cooking at home. We found that the income rebound effects should be considered to evaluate environmental loads induced by different consumption patterns.
This paper is concerned with a new integrated analytical model for evaluating environmental loads induced by consumer behavior. The model consists of two components: One is the waste input-output (WIO) model that is a consistent framework for the hybrid life-cycle assessment and life-cycle costing. The other is an economics model of consumer behavior within the constraints of limited income and time based on the concept of consumption 'technologies.' Because consumers are regarded as industrial sectors in the newly developed model, not only time and income rebound effects but also a part of the so-called economy-wide rebound effects is accounted for.
fax 01-972-952-9435.References at the end of the paper.
AbstractIn some Middle Eastern wells, the serious problem of shallow casing leaks results from an insufficient cement seal across a corrosive water formation containing hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). Factors contributing to this poor seal include multiple weak adjacent zones and thin lenticular washouts, which complicate conventional cementing practices by preventing slurries from sealing off water-bearing formations and protecting the well casings. Historically, multistage cementing has only marginally improved zonal isolation in this region. High-quality foamed slurries [slurries with high volumetric concentrations of nitrogen (N 2 )] can enable coverage of the weak zone, but these slurries are too permeable to provide long-term casing protection.A joint study conducted to address casing-leak problems in a Middle Eastern field has yielded custom cement blends that mitigate the combined detrimental effects of (1) water containing H 2 S, (2) mud or whole-cement losses to lost-circulation zones (zones with very low fracture gradients), and (3) muddisplacement deficiencies primarily caused by multiple washed out sections. Successful slurries that appear (based on laboratory results) to combat these problems are foamed with nitrogen and feature a combination of Portland and pozzolan cements plus hollow pozzolan spheres. This paper discusses large-scale tests and the blends designed for these tests. Researchers conducted these tests in an attempt to prove the effectiveness of certain cement blends and to help optimize those blends. The tests show that foamed, lightweight (8 to 10 lbm/gal) slurries containing hollow pozzolan spheres with pozzolan cement can enhance the sealing of harsh-water zones. This enhancement is achieved by the combined effects of two events: (1) improving displacement of drilling mud and cuttings by optimizing foam quality, and (2) cementing past lost-circulation zones. Details of blends, test setups, and test results are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.