We evaluate the effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope. In eight rabbits, the calvarial bone was exposed and a circular groove was prepared with a trephine drill. After marrow penetration, a standardized hemispherical titanium cap, either with or without small holes (1.5 mm in diameter), was then placed into the bone and covered by a cutaneous flap. After 1 month or 3 months of healing, the animals were euthanized and examined histologically. The percentage area of newly generated tissue consisting of mineralized bone and marrow spaces in each section was calculated relative to the area bounded by the hemispherical shape of the titanium cap and the parent bone; this latter volume was taken to be 100%. Furthermore, the cross-sectional areas of generated mineralized bone expressed as percentages of the total tissue area generated within each space were determined. In the 1-month specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between the two caps in the amount of tissue generated, 54.7%+/-12.2% with holes vs. 60.4%+/-8.8% without holes (p=0.225). However, in the 3-month specimens, we observed a significant difference between the caps (55.9%+/-7.4% with holes vs. 89.9%+/-6.5% without holes, P<0.05). Also, there was a statistically significant difference between 1- and 3-month specimens in the amount of tissue generated under the cap without holes (60.4%+/-8.8% vs. 89.9%+/-6.5%, P<0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the relative amount of mineralized bone generated between the caps with holes and those without holes in the 1-month specimens (27.7%+/-4.8% vs. 30.8%+/-6.4%, P=0.225), there was a statistically significant difference between the two caps in the 3-month specimens (24.3%+/-4.1% with holes vs. 34.0%+/-8.6% without holes, P<0.05). A substantial ingrowth of fibrous connective tissue through the holes appeared to prevent further new tissue generation in a defined area adjacent to the bone surface. We concluded that total occlusiveness, sufficient stiffness of the cap, as well as the passage of time will allow predictable mineralized bone augmentation to occur in spaces beyond the skeletal envelope.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes on experimental guided bone augmentation in 8 Japanese white rabbits. A cutaneous flap was demarcated and raised from the forehead of each animal, the periosteum was lifted, and the calvarial bone on both sides of the midline was exposed. A titanium screw was inserted into the bone on each side of the midline and one screw was covered with a bioabsorbable (polylactic acid) membrane and the other with a non-resorbable (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) membrane. The implanted screws and membranes were then covered with the periosteum and cutaneous flap. After healing for 6 months, the animals were euthanized and the experimental area was prepared for histological investigation. New bone had formed under both membranes with no sign of infection or membrane exposure. The amount of newly generated bone (89.0 +/- 17.3% versus 54.7 +/- 14.0%, P <0.05) and the percentage of newly generated bone height (81.5 +/- 6.3% versus 58.9 +/- 7.8%, P <0.05) in the space beneath the non-resorbable membrane was greater than that beneath the bioabsorbable membrane. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes with respect to the percentage areas of mineralized bone (52.3 +/- 11.3% versus 47.1 +/- 6.7%, P = 0.8658) and bone marrow (47.7 +/- 11.3% versus 52.9 +/- 6.7%, P = 0.4838) and bone contact with the screw (88.3 +/- 6.9% versus 89.2 +/- 7.3%, P = 0.9999). In conclusion, at least within the limitations of this rabbit model, we suggest that non-resorbable membranes with sufficient stiffness should be used to obtain greater bone volume and height instead of bioabsorbable membranes for the GBR procedure, and that this will facilitate predictable bone augmentation in spaces beyond the bone surface. Therefore, the bioabsorbable membrane could not replace the non-resorbable membrane used in this model.
The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of osseointegration between hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated and uncoated threaded titanium dental implants placed into a surgically created bone defect with or without an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane. A conventional implant site was prepared and either a HA-coated or an uncoated implant was placed in each tibia of 12 rabbits (conventional group). A bone defect approximately 3 mm in width was created on the distal end of the conventional site and either a HAcoated or an uncoated implant was placed there (bone defect group). For another group, the same procedure was performed as in the bone defect group, except the implant sites were covered with ePTFE membranes (ePTFE group). After 4 months, the rabbits were sacrificed. Specimens were prepared and examined histometrically. The results demonstrated that HAcoated threaded titanium dental implants consistently showed a greater amount of osseointegrated surface either in the conventional site or defect region with and without ePTFE membranes in this animal model. In conclusion, a HA-coated threaded titanium implant may be the choice of dental implants to establish greater osseointegration with the defect or conventional site.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.