Background
We evaluated the accuracy of endoscopic findings observed by narrow band imaging (NBI) combined with magnifying gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) for the differential diagnosis of cancerous and noncancerous laryngeal lesions.
Methods
A total of 166 vocal cord lesions for which good images were obtained on NBI with magnifying GIE were evaluated with respect to the following 6 variables: macroscopic type, tumor location, color, white coat, keratinization, and abnormal microvessels.
Results
Multivariate analysis showed that white coat (odds ratio [OR], 2.95, P = 0.05), keratosis (OR, 3.14, P = 0.02) and abnormal microvessels (OR, 31.1, P < 0.0001) were significantly related to laryngeal cancer. In the diagnosis of laryngeal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of abnormal microvessels were 84.4%, 88.6%, 91%, 80.5%, and 86.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
The abnormal microvessels on NBI combined with magnifying GIE are useful for the differential diagnosis of laryngeal lesions.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy has been known to be able to cope with tumor excisions with minimal margins. Extended resection may result in a limited margin and may impair the prognosis. We conducted a clinicopathologic analysis of local recurrence in supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy patients. Methods: Between 1997 and 2013, 100 patients with glottic cancers underwent supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. The clinicopathologic findings were evaluated. We also analyzed: (i) cancer-specific and overall survival rates, (ii) the correlation between locoregional recurrence and overall survival, (iii) T staging and larynx preservation rates and (iv) previous radiation history and larynx preservation rates. Results: Local recurrence was recognized in eight of the 100 patients (8%); all were initially staged as T3 or T4. Recurrence was identified in the submucosal regions of the ipsilateral arytenoid and/or infraglottis. Six patients were salvaged by completion total laryngectomy except two. Cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 93%; overall survival at 5 years was 89%. There was no significant difference between overall survival and locoregional recurrence. There was a significant difference between larynx preservation in T1-2 and T3-4 patients. There was no significant difference between larynx preservation and the previous radiation therapy status. Conclusions: Our experience convinced us of the clinical potential of supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy as one of the effective options for functional larynx preservation. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy is the most suitable for unfavorable T2 and T3a cases and is applicable for appropriately selected radiation-failed patients. Thorough preoperative evaluation, proper surgical techniques and careful follow-up are prerequisites for the success of supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy.
Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery-transoral pharyngectomies are useful procedures for treating superficial hypopharyngeal cancers. Endoscopic mucosal resection manifested the least invasiveness and may be beneficial for resecting small superficial lesions, endoscopic submucosal dissection may be advantageous for patients with difficult laryngopharyngeal exposure and endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery has shown the optimal effectiveness and minimal complications and can be applied to most of the hypopharyngeal sub-sites. All three procedures require a high level of technical skill and close collaboration between otolaryngologists and gastroenterologists.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.