Purpose: Regorafenib is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic (VEGFR1-3, TIE2), stromal (PDGFR-b, FGFR), and oncogenic kinases (KIT, RET, and RAF). This first-in-man, phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy profiles of regorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment were recruited. Regorafenib was administered orally for 21 days on/seven days off in repeating cycles, until discontinuation due to toxicity or tumor progression. Adverse events (AE) were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured after a single dose and on day 21. Pharmacodynamic and efficacy evaluations included tumor perfusion assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, plasma cytokines, and tumor response using RECIST (v1.0).Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled into eight cohorts at dose levels from 10 to 220 mg daily. The recommended dose for future studies was determined to be 160 mg daily, with a treatment schedule of 21 days on/seven days off in repeating 28-day cycles. The most common drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs were dermatologic AEs (hand-foot skin reaction, rash), hypertension, and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a similar exposure at steady state for the parent compound and two pharmacologically active metabolites. Tumor perfusion and plasma cytokine analysis showed biologic activity of regorafenib. Three of 47 evaluable patients achieved a partial response (renal cell carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and osteosarcoma).Conclusion: Regorafenib showed an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 18(9); 2658-67. Ó2012 AACR.

In heavily pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, 75 and 250 mg temsirolimus showed antitumor activity and 75 mg temsirolimus showed a generally tolerable safety profile.

Once-daily oral AZD2171 at doses of 45 mg or less was generally well tolerated and was associated with encouraging antitumor activity in patients with a broad range of advanced solid tumors.

Purpose: BIBF 1120 is an oral, potent angiokinase inhibitor targeting receptors of the vascular endothelial growth factors, platelet-derived growth factors, and fibroblast growth factors. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of BIBF 1120.Patients and Methods: Sixty-one patients with advanced cancers received BIBF 1120 in successive cohorts. Twenty-five received 50 to 450 mg once daily and 36 received 150 to 300 mg twice daily in 4-week treatment courses interspersed by 1 week of washout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessed antiangiogenic effect in 42 patients.Results: Most frequent BIBF 1120-related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate (Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1-2) nausea (68.9%), vomiting (45.9%), and diarrhea (44.3%). The majority of dose-limiting adverse events of Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 were reversible liver enzyme elevations. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg of BIBF 1120 for once and twice daily dosing. BIBF 1120 was absorbed moderately fast (t max = 1-3 hours at steady state), with no deviation from dose linearity and no decrease of exposure over time. The gMean terminal half-life was from 13 to 19 hours. One complete and two partial responses occurred in patients with renal cell cancer (n = 2) and colorectal cancer (n = 1). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a significant reduction in tumor blood flow in 55% of evaluable patients.

Background:In a phase I dose-escalation study, regorafenib demonstrated tolerability and antitumour activity in solid tumour patients. The study was expanded to focus on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods:Patients received oral regorafenib 60–220 mg daily (160 mg daily in the extension cohort) in cycles of 21 days on, 7 days off treatment. Assessments included toxicity, response, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Results:Thirty-eight patients with heavily pretreated CRC (median 4 prior lines of therapy, range 0–7) were enrolled in the dose-escalation and extension phases; 26 patients received regorafenib 160 mg daily. Median treatment duration was 53 days (range 7–280 days). The most common treatment-related toxicities included hand–foot skin reaction, fatigue, voice change and rash. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for response: 1 achieved partial response and 19 had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 107 days (95% CI, 66–161). At steady state, regorafenib and its active metabolites had similar systemic exposure. Pharmacodynamic assessment indicated decreased tumour perfusion in most patients.Conclusion:Regorafenib showed tolerability and antitumour activity in patients with metastatic CRC. This expanded-cohort phase I study provided the foundation for further clinical trials of regorafenib in this patient population.

Background: Titanocene dichloride (MKT4) is a recently developed cytostatic agent that shows preclinical activity against human breast cancer xenograft models in nude mice. A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical activity of this inorganic early-transition metal complex in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients were enrolled into this multicenter phase II trial. Twelve patients with a median age of 58 years were eligible for toxicity and response. All 12 patients had prior surgery and metastatic disease at study entry. Seven patients had prior radiotherapy, 9 patients had prior hormone therapy, and 8 patients had prior adjuvant chemotherapy. No previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease was allowed. Titanocene dichloride was intravenously administered at a dose of 270 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Results: Among the 12 eligible patients evaluable for response, no objective remission was observed. Two patients (17%) showed a ‘minor remission’, and 5 patients (42%) experienced a ‘no change’ situation of their disease. Moderate to severe drug-related toxicities (CTC grade II–III) affecting the gastrointestinal, neurological, hepatic and renal system occurred in the majority of patients. Therefore, in 5 patients the dose had to be reduced to 240 mg/m². Conclusion: MKT4, given at a dose of 240–270 mg/m² in this schedule, was not effective in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The tolerability of the 3-weekly dosing regimen was acceptable when the MKT4 dose was reduced to 240 mg/m².

The MTD of BI 2536 when administered as a single-dose, 1-hour infusion was 200 mg; BI 2536 was well tolerated and showed a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Antitumor activity of BI 2536 was observed.

Here, we evaluated relationships between ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein, MDR1) polymorphisms and paclitaxel (Taxol)-induced toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Twenty-six patients were assessable for pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics, 22 for neurotoxicity and 18 for myelotoxicity. Patients carrying two reference alleles for the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism trended toward a reduced risk to develop neuropathy as compared to patients carrying at least one variant allele (P=0.09). Additionally, patients that were homozygous variant at the 2677 and 3435 loci had a significantly greater percent decrease in absolute neutrophil count at nadir (P=0.02). Neither polymorphism correlated with paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. This pilot study suggests that paclitaxel-induced neuropathy and neutropenia might be linked to inherited variants of ABCB1 through a mechanism that is unrelated to altered plasma pharmacokinetics.