Although time forms a part of the very bedrock of international law as a legal order and fundamentally determines international law as a discipline, the relationship between time and international law has received only limited attention. To most international lawyers, time appears as simply a technical problem, and mainstream international law doctrine presents international law as essentially atemporal. However, such attitudes obscure the complex temporalities involved in international law and the choices that have underpinned them. Time in international law is profoundly multifaceted, and there is a significant intra-disciplinary diversity in the understanding of the relationship between international law and time. Nevertheless, international law and international lawyers may be said to primarily cope and engage with time in two main-albeit intertwined-ways: through the construction of narratives and through the development of legal techniques.
International Law and TimeTime is omnipresent in international legal practice and scholarship, just as it is in all aspects of human life. Although intangible, even elusive, time is all-pervasive, conspicuous, and ever-present. Time underlies international law's norms, institutions and processes, and forms a part of the very bedrock of international law as a legal order; it also fundamentally determines international law as a discipline. However, K. P. Van der Ploeg (B)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.