BackgroundThe efficacy of brace treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains controversial. To make comparisons among studies more valid and reliable, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) has standardized criteria for brace studies in patients with AIS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Osaka Medical College (OMC) brace for AIS in accordance with the modified standardized criteria proposed by the SRS committee on bracing and non-operative management.MethodsFrom 1999 through 2010, 31 consecutive patients with AIS who were newly prescribed the OMC brace and met the modified SRS criteria were studied. The study included 2 boys and 29 girls with a mean age of 12 years and 0 month. Patients were instructed to wear the brace for a minimum of 20 hours per day at the beginning of brace treatment. The mean duration of brace treatment was 4 years and 8 months. We examined the initial brace correction rate and the clinical outcomes of main curves evaluated by curve progression and surgical rate, and the compliance evaluated by the instruction adherence rate for all cases. The clinical course of the brace treatment was considered progression if ≥6° curvature increase occurred and improvement if ≥6° curvature decrease occurred according to SRS judgment criteria.ResultsThe average initial brace correction rate was 46.8%. In 10 cases the curve progressed, 6 cases the curve improved, and 15 cases the curve remained unchanged (success rate: 67.7%). The mean instruction adherence rate, that was defined the percentage of the visits that patients declared they mostly followed our instruction to total visits, was 53.7%. The success rate was statistically higher in the patient group whose instruction adherence rate was greater than 50% (88.2%) as compared with in those 50% or less (42.8%).ConclusionsOMC brace treatment for AIS patients could alter the natural history and significantly decreased the progression of curves to the threshold for surgical intervention. Better instruction adherence of brace wear associated with greater success.

BackgroundFactors influencing clinical course of brace treatment apply to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients remain unclear. By making clear them, we may select suitable patients for brace treatment and alleviate overtreatment. The purpose of this study was to explore predictive factors of Osaka Medical College (OMC) brace treatment for AIS patients in accordance with the modified standardized criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) committee on bracing and non-operative management.MethodsFrom 1999 through 2010, 31 consecutive patients with AIS who were newly prescribed the OMC brace and met the modified SRS criteria were studied. The study included 2 boys and 29 girls with a mean age of 12 years and 0 month. We investigated the clinical course and evaluated the impacts of compliance, initial brace correction rate, curve flexibility, curve pattern, Cobb angle, chronological age, and Risser stage to clinical outcomes. The clinical course of the brace treatment was considered progression if ≥6° curvature increase occurred and improvement if ≥6° curvature decrease occurred according to SRS judgment criteria.ResultsThe curve progressed in 10 cases, the curve improved in 6 cases, and the curve remained unchanged in 15 cases (success rate: 67.7%). The success rate was statistically higher in the patient group whose instruction adherence rate was greater than 50% as compared with in those 50% or less. Initial brace correction rate, curve flexibility, curve pattern, the magnitude of Cobb angle, chronological age, and Risser stage did not have any significant effect for clinical courses. However, success rate was insignificantly higher in the cases whose Cobb angle in brace was smaller than that in hanging position.ConclusionsOMC brace treatment could alter the natural history of AIS, however, that was significantly affected by compliance of brace wear.

The volume loss of skeletal muscle, including lumbar paravertebral muscles, is negatively correlated with the rate of lumbo-pelvic deformity. Moreover, ectopic fat infiltration with highly expressed adipogenesis promoting genes in the paravertebral muscles may reflect pathology of sarcopenia and may cause age-related lumbo-pelvic deformity.

Although there was a statistically significant correlation between body height and the optimal depth of insertion of left sided double lumen tubes in adult patients of short stature (< or = 155 cm), clinical application of the equation is not warranted and these tubes should be inserted under direct vision with a fibre-optic bronchoscope.

Background: A vertebral fracture in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is unstable due to larger moment via the long lever arm of an ankylosed spine. Therefore, surgical treatment is commonly recommended to avoid complications of nonunion and paralysis. In this report, we present 3 cases of vertebral fractures related to DISH which were primarily forced to undertake conservative treatment because of medical comorbidities and advanced age.Case 1: A 93-year-old woman suffered from T10 vertebral fracture by a ground-level fall on her back. A trunk cast for 6 weeks was followed by brace wear for 3 months with administration of daily teriparatide. Then complete bone union was confirmed at 2 years after injury without back pain.Case 2: An 84-year-old man suffered from T12 vertebral fracture by a fall on his back from a chair. A trunk cast for 12 weeks was followed by brace wear for 6 months with administration of daily teriparatide. Then acceptable bone union was confirmed at 1 year after the injury, and activities of daily living became independent.Case 3: An 87-year-old woman suffered from T10 vertebral fracture due to a ground-level fall on her back when doing pruning work. Conservative treatment by trunk cast was first initiated with administration of daily teriparatide. However, delayed paralysis developed at 2 weeks after casting, so minimally invasive spinal stabilization (MISt) was performed. Bone union was obtained at 1 year after the injury without any neurological impairment.Conclusions: Favorable clinical courses have been obtained in 2 cases, whereas MISt was required for delayed paralysis in 1 case. Although surgical stabilization is the first-line treatment for vertebral fracture with DISH, conservative treatment can also be one of the options in cases with high operative risk due to serious medical comorbidities. However, during conservative treatment, cautious observation is necessary not to overlook the occurrence of paralysis.Level of Evidence: 4. Clinical Relevance: Conservative treatment for vertebral fracture with DISH can be one of the options in cases with high operative risk due to serious medical comorbidities.