Shifts in the timing of spring phenology are a central feature of global change research. Long-term observations of plant phenology have been used to track vegetation responses to climate variability but are often limited to particular species and locations and may not represent synoptic patterns. Satellite remote sensing is instead used for continental to global monitoring. Although numerous methods exist to extract phenological timing, in particular start-of-spring (SOS), from time series of reflectance data, a comprehensive intercomparison and interpretation of SOS methods has not been conducted. Here, we assess 10 SOS methods for North America between 1982 and 2006. The techniques include consistent inputs from the 8 km Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer NDVIg dataset, independent data for snow cover, soil thaw, lake ice dynamics, spring streamflow timing, over 16 000 individual measurements of ground-based phenology, and two temperature-driven models of spring phenology. Compared with an ensemble of the 10 SOS methods, we found that individual methods differed in average day-of-year estimates by AE 60 days and in standard deviation by AE 20 days. The ability of the satellite methods to retrieve SOS estimates was highest in northern latitudes and lowest in arid, tropical, and Mediterranean ecoregions. The ordinal rank of SOS methods varied geographically, as did the relationships between SOS estimates and the cryospheric/hydrologic metrics. Compared with ground observations, SOS estimates were more related to the first leaf and first flowers expanding phenological stages. We found no evidence for time trends in spring arrival from ground-or model-based data; using an ensemble estimate from two methods that were more closely related to ground observations than other methods, SOS Correspondence: Michael A. White, tel. 1 1 435 797 3794, fax 1 1 435 797 187, trends could be detected for only 12% of North America and were divided between trends towards both earlier and later spring.
The International Geosphere-Biosphere Program has delineated five study areas that form a northern high-latitude network for the analyses of vegetation and carbon dynamics. We examined the magnitude and significance of changes in the land surface phenologies of ecoregions within these transects using the NASA Pathfinder Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer Land dataset. We applied the seasonal Mann-Kendall (SMK) trend test, a robust and nonparametric approach, to determine the significance of trends in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) over the five transects. The SMK trend test provides an important alternative over the frequently used but unreliable trend analysis based on linear regression.In addition, we modeled the land surface phenology using quadratic or nonlinear spherical models to relate the NDVI data to accumulated growing degree-days (base 0 1C). Nonlinear spherical models parsimoniously describe the green-up dynamics in taiga and tundra ecoregions. Models for each ecoregion within each transect were fitted separately for two time periods (1985-1988 and 1995-1999) and their parameter coefficient estimates were compared. In 10 of 24 ecoregions that comprise 72% of the land area in the transects, the date of the peak NDVI value was significantly earlier (range 2-18 days) in the second study period than in the first study period. This progression was more pronounced in North America than in Siberia (weighted average of 9.3 vs. 6.3 days earlier).Understanding of what constitutes significant change in land surface phenology amidst background variation is a critical component of global change science. A diversity of datasets, techniques, and study areas has led to a range of conclusions about boreal phenology. We discuss statistical pitfalls in standard analyses and offer a framework to conduct statistically reliable change assessments of land surface phenologies.
Evidence for global insect declines mounts, increasing our need to understand underlying mechanisms. We test the nutrient dilution (ND) hypothesis—the decreasing concentration of essential dietary minerals with increasing plant productivity—that particularly targets insect herbivores. Nutrient dilution can result from increased plant biomass due to climate or CO2 enrichment. Additionally, when considering long-term trends driven by climate, one must account for large-scale oscillations including El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). We combine long-term datasets of grasshopper abundance, climate, plant biomass, and end-of-season foliar elemental content to examine potential drivers of abundance cycles and trends of this dominant herbivore. Annual grasshopper abundances in 16- and 22-y time series from a Kansas prairie revealed both 5-y cycles and declines of 2.1–2.7%/y. Climate cycle indices of spring ENSO, summer NAO, and winter or spring PDO accounted for 40–54% of the variation in grasshopper abundance, mediated by effects of weather and host plants. Consistent with ND, grass biomass doubled and foliar concentrations of N, P, K, and Na—nutrients which limit grasshopper abundance—declined over the same period. The decline in plant nutrients accounted for 25% of the variation in grasshopper abundance over two decades. Thus a warming, wetter, more CO2-enriched world will likely contribute to declines in insect herbivores by depleting nutrients from their already nutrient-poor diet. Unlike other potential drivers of insect declines—habitat loss, light and chemical pollution—ND may be widespread in remaining natural areas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.