The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unique challenges for the clinical trial community, both in the rapid establishment of COVID-19 clinical trials and many existing non-COVID-19 studies either being temporarily paused (whether that is a complete pause or pause in some activities) and/or adapting their processes. Trial managers have played a key role in decision-making, undertaking risk assessments and adapting trial processes, working closely with other members of the research team. This article presents some of the ways in which trial management processes have been altered and the key role that trial managers have played. It has been born out of discussions between trial managers in the UK who are members of the UK Trial Managers’ Network (UKTMN), a national network of trial management professionals managing non-commercial trials. In these unprecedented times, clinical trials have faced many uncertainties and broad-ranging challenges encompassing a range of activities including prioritising patient safety amidst the pandemic, consenting and recruiting new participants into trials, data collection and management and intervention delivery. In many cases, recruitment has been paused whilst mitigations have been put in place to continue data collection. Innovative solutions have been implemented to ensure we continue, where possible, to deliver high-quality clinical trials. Technology has provided many solutions to these challenges, and trial managers have adapted to new ways of working whilst continuing to deliver their clinical trials. Trial management groups are now faced with new uncertainties around re-starting clinical trials, and it is unclear currently how this will go, though working together with sponsors, funders and site teams is clearly a priority. Clinical trial teams have worked together to ensure their trials have adapted quickly whilst ensuring participant safety is given utmost importance. There are clear examples where the trial community have come together to share experiences and expertise, and this should continue in the future to ensure the innovative practices developed become embedded in the design and conduct of clinical trials in the future.

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is a common disorder characterized by focal abnormalities of bone remodeling. We previously identified variants at the CSF1, OPTN and TNFRSF11A loci as risk factors for PDB by genome-wide association study. Here we extended this study, identified three new loci and confirmed their association with PDB in 2,215 affected individuals (cases) and 4,370 controls from seven independent populations. The new associations were with rs5742915 within PML on 15q24 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, P = 1.6 × 10(-14)), rs10498635 within RIN3 on 14q32 (OR = 1.44, P = 2.55 × 10(-11)) and rs4294134 within NUP205 on 7q33 (OR = 1.45, P = 8.45 × 10(-10)). Our data also confirmed the association of TM7SF4 (rs2458413, OR = 1.40, P = 7.38 × 10(-17)) with PDB. These seven loci explained ∼13% of the familial risk of PDB. These studies provide new insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of PDB.

No abstract

Paget disease of bone (PDB) is a common disorder characterized by increased bone turnover at one of more sites throughout the skeleton. Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of PDB, and the most important predisposing gene is SQSTM1, which is mutated in about 10% of patients. Here we investigated the relationship between SQSTM1 mutation status, disease severity, and clinical outcome in 737 patients who took part in a randomized study of two different management strategies for the disease. Mutations of SQSTM1 were detected in 80 of 737 (10.9%) patients. Mutation carriers had an earlier age at diagnosis (59.4 AE11.5 versus 65.0 AE 10.4 years, p < .0001) and a greater number of affected bones (3.2 AE 1.2 versus 2.1 AE 1.2, p < .001) and more commonly required orthopedic surgery (26.2% versus 16.1%, p ¼ .024) and bisphosphonate therapy (86.3% versus 75.2%, p ¼ .01) than those without mutations. Quality of life, as assessed by the short-form-36 (SF36) physical summary score, was significantly reduced in carriers (34.0 AE 11.3 versus 37.1 AE 11.4, p ¼ .036). During the study, fractures were more common in carriers (12.5% versus 5.3%, p ¼ .011), although most of these occurred in unaffected bone. This study demonstrates that SQSTM1 mutations are strongly associated with disease severity and complications of PDB. Genetic testing for SQSTM1 mutations may be of value in identifying individuals at risk of developing severe disease, but further studies will be required to determine if a program of genetic testing and early intervention in these individuals would be cost-effective or be of benefit in preventing these complications. ß

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) has a strong genetic component. Here, we investigated possible associations between genetic variants that predispose to PDB and disease severity. Allelic variants identified as predictors of PDB from genome-wide association studies were analyzed in 1940 PDB patients from the United Kingdom, Italy, Western Australia, and Spain. A cumulative risk allele score was constructed by adding the variants together and relating this to markers of disease severity, alone and in combination with SQSTM1 mutations. In SQSTM1-negative patients, risk allele scores in the highest tertile were associated with a 27% increase in disease extent compared with the lowest tertile (p < 0.00001) with intermediate values in the middle tertile (20% increase; p ¼ 0.0007). The effects were similar for disease severity score, which was 15% (p ¼ 0.01) and 25% (p < 0.00001) higher in the middle and upper tertiles, respectively. Risk allele score remained a significant predictor of extent and severity when SQSTM-positive individuals were included, with an effect size approximately one-third of that observed with SQSTM1 mutations. A genetic risk score was developed by combining information from both markers, which identified subgroups of individuals with low, medium, and high levels of severity with a specificity of 70% and sensitivity of 55%. Risk allele scores and SQSTM1 mutations both predict extent and severity of PDB. It is possible that with further refinement, genetic profiling may be of clinical value in identifying individuals at high risk of severe disease who might benefit from enhanced surveillance and early intervention.

It has been suggested that normalization of bone turnover may improve clinical outcome in Paget's disease of bone (PDB) by preventing complications such as fractures and the progression of osteoarthritis. Here we investigated the long-term effects of a treatment strategy that aimed to normalize bone turnover in PDB with that of symptomatic treatment. The study group comprised 502 subjects who were enrolled into a three-year extension of the Paget's Disease: Randomised Trial of Intensive versus Symptomatic Management (PRISM) study. Intensive bisphosphonate therapy was continued in 270 of these subjects with the aim of normalising serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) concentrations using zoledronic acid as the treatment of first-choice. Symptomatic treatment was continued in 232 subjects where bisphosphonates were given only if there was bone pain thought to be caused by PDB. The primary outcome was fracture and secondary outcomes were orthopaedic procedures, quality of life and bone pain, adjusted for baseline characteristics. Serum total ALP concentrations were significantly lower in the intensive group on entry to the study and the differences between groups increased as the study progressed. There were no clinically important differences in quality of life measures or bone pain between the treatment groups.Intensive treatment was associated with a non-significant increase in fracture risk (hazard ratio We conclude that long-term intensive bisphosphonate therapy confers no clinical benefit over symptomatic therapy and is associated with a non-significant increase in the risk of fractures, orthopaedic events and serious adverse events. The results of this study suggest that in patients with established PDB, bisphosphonate therapy should focus on control of symptoms rather than suppression of bone turnover.

IntroductionPopulation screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) halves the associated mortality and has led to the establishment of national screening programmes. Prediction of aneurysm growth and rupture is challenging and currently relies on serial diameter measurements with ultrasound. Recently, a novel MRI-based technique using ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) has demonstrated considerable promise as a method of identifying aneurysm inflammation and expansion.Methods and analysisThe MA3RS study is a prospective observational multicentre cohort study of 350 patients with AAA in three centres across Scotland. All participants will undergo MRI with USPIO and aneurysm expansion will be measured over 2 years with CT in addition to standard clinical ultrasound surveillance. The relationship between mural USPIO uptake and subsequent clinical outcomes, including expansion, rupture and repair, will be evaluated and used to determine whether the technique augments standard risk prediction markers. To ensure adequate sensitivity to answer the primary question, we need to observe 130 events (composite of rupture or repair) with an estimated event rate of 41% over 2 years of follow-up. The MA3RS study is currently recruiting and expects to report in 2017.DiscussionThis is the first study to evaluate the use of USPIO-enhanced MRI to provide additional information to aid risk prediction models in patients with AAA. If successful, this study will lay the foundation for a large randomised controlled trial targeted at applying this technique to determine clinical management.Trial registration numberCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN76413758.

BackgroundElafin is a potent endogenous neutrophil elastase inhibitor that protects against myocardial inflammation and injury in preclinical models of ischaemic-reperfusion injury. We investigated whether elafin could inhibit myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury induced during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.Methods and resultsIn a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group clinical trial, 87 patients undergoing CABG surgery were randomised 1:1 to intravenous elafin 200 mg or saline placebo administered after induction of anaesthesia and prior to sternotomy. Myocardial injury was measured as cardiac troponin I release over 48 h (area under the curve (AUC)) and myocardial infarction identified with MRI. Postischaemic inflammation was measured by plasma markers including AUC high-sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Elafin infusion was safe and resulted in >3000-fold increase in plasma elafin concentrations and >50% inhibition of elastase activity in the first 24 h. This did not reduce myocardial injury over 48 h (ratio of geometric means (elafin/placebo) of AUC troponin I 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.15, p=0.18)) although post hoc analysis of the high-sensitive assay revealed lower troponin I concentrations at 6 h in elafin-treated patients (median 2.4 vs 4.1 μg/L, p=0.035). Elafin had no effect on myocardial infarction (elafin, 7/34 vs placebo, 5/35 patients) or on markers of inflammation: mean differences for AUC hs-CRP of 499 mg/L/48 h (95% CI −207 to 1205, p=0.16), and AUC MPO of 238 ng/mL/48 h (95% CI −235 to 711, p=0.320).ConclusionsThere was no strong evidence that neutrophil elastase inhibition with a single-dose elafin treatment reduced myocardial injury and inflammation following CABG-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury.Trial registration number(EudraCT 2010-019527-58, ISRCTN82061264).