Growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF9) and bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP15) are co-expressed exclusively in oocytes throughout most of folliculogenesis and play central roles in controlling ovarian physiology. Although both growth factors exist as homodimers, recent evidence indicates that GDF9 and BMP15 can also heterodimerize to form the potent growth factor cumulin. Within the cumulin complex, BMP15 “activates” latent GDF9, enabling potent signaling in granulosa cells via type I receptors (i.e. activin receptor-like kinase-4/5 (ALK4/5)) and SMAD2/3 transcription factors. In the cumulin heterodimer, two distinct type I receptor interfaces are formed compared with homodimeric GDF9 and BMP15. Previous studies have highlighted the potential of cumulin to improve treatment of female infertility, but, as a noncovalent heterodimer, cumulin is difficult to produce and purify without contaminating GDF9 and BMP15 homodimers. In this study we addressed this challenge by focusing on the cumulin interface formed by the helix of the GDF9 chain and the fingers of the BMP15 chain. We demonstrate that unique BMP15 finger residues at this site (Arg301, Gly304, His307, and Met369) enable potent activation of the SMAD2/3 pathway. Incorporating these BMP15 residues into latent GDF9 generated a highly potent growth factor, called hereafter Super-GDF9. Super-GDF9 was >1000-fold more potent than WT human GDF9 and 4-fold more potent than cumulin in SMAD2/3-responsive transcriptional assays in granulosa cells. Our demonstration that Super-GDF9 can effectively promote mouse cumulus cell expansion and improve oocyte quality in vitro represents a potential solution to the current challenges of producing and purifying intact cumulin.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThe number of women who undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) in the hope of preserving their fertility is increasing. Fertility clinic websites often serve as the first point of contact for women contemplating EOC. There are no guidelines for Australian fertility clinics regarding how information about procedures should be presented.AimTo assess the quality of information presented on EOC on Australian fertility clinic websites.Materials and MethodsA desktop audit was conducted of the websites of Australian fertility clinics offering EOC (n = 21) and the information provided about EOC was recorded. To allow comparison, a scoring matrix used in a study of the quality of EOC information on clinic websites in the USA was used to assess the quality of the information. The possible range of scores on this measure is 0–13.ResultsThe mean information quality score for all clinic websites was 4.3 (range 2–8). More than half of the clinic websites (57%) had scores classified as ‘poor’, indicating that women are not receiving the information they need to make well‐informed choices.ConclusionProviding information on clinic websites that is transparent and scientifically accurate, that states the risks involved in the procedure, and its full cost is essential to allow women to make informed decisions. The scoring matrix used in this study to assess the quality of information relating to EOC can guide best practice for clinics in advertising EOC to prospective customers.

PurposeTo study the efficacy and efficiency of a “universal warming protocol” for vitrified human embryos, based on subsequent steps with 1 and 0.5 M concentration of extracellular cryoprotectant (ECCP).MethodTwo studies on patients undergoing fertility treatments via ICSI: a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a retrospective cohort study (CS). Setting: Private assisted reproductive (AR) center.RCT: duration 01/03/2017–01/10/2017; 315 embryos at blastocyst stage obtained from 169 patients. Each patient’s embryos were first randomized for vitrification with two different kits: Vitrification Kit (Kitazato, Japan) and Sage Vitrification Kit (Origio, Denmark). The embryos were randomly warmed with either Kitazato (K) or Sage (S) warming kits, specifically: group A (KK), group B (KS), group C (SK), and group D (SS). Primary outcome measure: survival rate (number of embryos surviving per number of embryos warmed). Secondary: implantation rate (number of embryos implanted per number of embryos transferred).CS: duration 01/01/2013–31/12/2015 embryos from patients’ own oocytes; 10/04/2015–31/07/2017 embryos from donors’ oocytes. A total of 1055 embryos vitrified at cleavage stage obtained from 631 warming cycles: 847 of these obtained from patients’ own oocytes, 208 egg-donation-derived embryos. Each patient’s embryos were vitrified and warmed in various combinations of three different vitrification/warming kits: Kitazato (K), Sage (S), or made in-house in our laboratory (H). Vitrification/warming kits from different manufacturers are routinely used in our AR center, and the warming procedures are randomly performed with any available kit on a “first-in-first-out” basis, irrespective of the kit used for vitrification. Group names: KK, KS, SK, SS, SH, HK, HS, HH (embryos from patients’ own oocytes); eKK, eKS, eSK, eSS (egg-donation-derived embryos).ResultsCryo-survival rates were comparable in all study groups.RCT. Group A 99.0% (96/97), group B 98.8% (83/84), group C 98.4% (61/62), and group D 98.6% (71/72).CS. Embryos from patients’ own oocytes: KK 96.4% (54/56), KS 100.0% (13/13), SK 98.8% (80/81), SS 97.2% (174/179), SH 97.6% (40/41), HK 95.2% (20/21), HS 99.5% (187/188), and HH 97.4% (261/268). Egg-donation-derived embryos: eKK 100.0% (91/91), eKS 98.4% (60/61), eSK 100.0% (26/26), and eSS 96.7 (29/30).Implantation was generally comparable in all study groups—exceptions were in CS: KS vs. SK (P = 0.049), SS (P = 0.012), HS (P = 0.010), HH (P = 0.025); and SH vs. SS (P = 0.042), HS (P = 0.035).ConclusionWorldwide, millions of embryos have been cryopreserved using different vitrification kits; these studies establish that it is possible to combine different kits for vitrification and warming using a universal warming protocol. This can optimize costs, simplify lab routines, and favor embryo exchange between IVF centers.RCT registration numberISRCTN12342851.