The integration of advance care planning (ACP) as part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of hospitalised frail elderly patients, together with the clinical and demographic factors that determine successful ACP discussion, has not been previously explored. METHODSA cross-sectional study on patients and family caregivers admitted under the geriatric medicine department of a tertiary hospital was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016. RESULTS Among 311 eligible patients, 116 (37.3%) patients completed ACP discussion while 166 (53.4%) patients declined, with 62 (37.3%) of the decliners providing reasons for refusal. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, poorer functional status and cognitive impairment had statistically significant associations with agreeing to ACP discussion (p < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only poorer functional status was significantly associated (odds ratio 2.22 [95% confidence interval 1.27-3.87]; p = 0.005). Among those who completed ACP discussion, a majority declined cardiopulmonary resuscitation (79.3%), preferred limited medical intervention or comfort care (82.8%), and opted for blood transfusion (62.9%), antibiotics (73.3%) and intravenous fluid (74.1%) but declined haemodialysis (50.9%). Decision-making was divided for enteral feeding. Among decliners, the main reasons for refusal were 'not keen' (33.9%), 'deferring to doctors' decision' (11.3%) and 'lack of ACP awareness' (11.3%). CONCLUSIONThe feasibility and utility of integrating ACP as part of CGA has been demonstrated. Poorer functional status is significantly associated with successful ACP discussion. Greater public education on end-of-life care choices (besides cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and follow-up with decliners are recommended.
The aim of this scholarly project was to implement and evaluate the efficacy of a tailored, multifaceted nursing educational program in prevention, early detection leading to early management of delirium in older adults aged 65 and above.Background: Delirium is a medical emergency which compromises patient safety due to its many negative consequences such as falls, prolonged hospitalisation, and increased use of restraints. Delirium is often missed or diagnosed late by physicians. As the frontline in patient care, nurses play an important role in early delirium detection and prevention. Therefore, educating nurses on delirium prevention and clinical application of a delirium screening tool is deemed necessary in caring for the elderly patients aged >65.Design: This was a three-phase study employing two-independent group pre-post design conducted at two mixed acute general medical/surgical wards in a large tertiary hospital. Methods: Phase 0 was to establish nurses' baseline knowledge of delirium, incidence of delirium, falls, restraint use, and length of stay amongst the eligible patients. Phase I was to implement the educational program which comprised of theoretical and practical components to the registered nurses in the two wards. Trained nurses then applied modified 4AT and delirium care bundle to eligible patients in Phase II.Results: Total of 61 nurses were involved in the training. There was significant improvement in nurses' knowledge of delirium after training, which was sustained at one month later. A total of 100 patients were recruited. The incidence of delirium was 8% in phase 0 and 6% in phase II. Patients with delirium had longer length of stay than patients without delirium. There was no significant difference in falls, restraint use and length of stay. Conclusions:A multifaceted delirium educational program improved nurses' knowledge in delirium screening and prevention. A longer study period for larger enrolment of patients is recommended to evaluate the longer term retention of knowledge and the effects on patient care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.