We examined associative and item recognition using the maintenance rehearsal paradigm. Our intent was to control for mnemonic strategies; to produce a low, graded level of learning; and to provide evidence of the role of attention in long-term memory. An advantage for low-frequency words emerged in both associative and item recognition at very low levels of learning. This early emergence casts doubt on explanations based on the traditional concept of recollection. A comparison of false alarms supports a role for item information or the joint use of cues but not familiarity in producing associative false alarms. We may also have found a way to measure the amount of attention being paid to a to-be-learned item or pair, independently of memory performance on the attended item. This result may be an important step in determining whether coherent theories about the role of attention in long- and short-term memory can be created. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
Research with the maintenance-rehearsal paradigm, in which word pairs are rehearsed as distractor material during a series of digit recall trials, has previously indicated that low frequency and new word pairs capture attention to a greater degree than high frequency and old word pairs. This impacts delayed recognition of the pairs and interferes with immediate digit recall. The effect on immediate digit recall may provide the missing converging evidence for the role of attention in memory. In the current study, 3 experiments were conducted to further investigate the role of attention capture and novelty in storage and forgetting. In addition to the previously established effects, the novelty of switching rehearsal between 2 pairs was found to impair both digit recall and memory for the first pair. The attentional effects we obtained were dependent upon participant expectation, and forgetting appears to be due to interference with consolidation rather than decay or traditional associative interference. Finally, the attentional effects we observed in associative recognition were primarily reflected in a lowering of the false alarm rate with increases in the strength of the parent pairs. Although dual-process models can accommodate this finding on the assumption that recollection is invoked at test alongside familiarity, we showed that the level of recall in this paradigm is so small that recollection can be ruled out. Accordingly, our results are challenging for the existing models of associative recognition to accommodate.
Context effects in recognition have played a major role in evaluating theories of recognition. Understanding how context impacts recognition is also important for making sound trade mark law. Consumers attempting to discriminate between the brand they are looking for and a look-alike product often have to differentiate products which share a great deal of common context: positioning on the supermarket shelf, the type of store, aspects of the packaging, or brand claims. Trade mark and related laws aim to protect brands and reduce consumer confusion, but courts assessing allegations of trade mark infringement often lack careful empirical evidence concerning the impact of brand and context similarity, and, in the absence of such evidence, make assumptions about how consumers respond to brands that downplay the importance of context and focus on the similarity of registered marks. The experiments reported in this paper aimed to test certain common assumptions in trade mark law, providing evidence that shared context can cause mistakes even where brand similarity is low. Keywords Recognition memory . Context . Global matching . Trade mark lawContext effects in recognition memory have been studied for over 40 years. 1 The role of context in a match of a test probe with memory played a prominent role in the development and testing of the Global Matching Models (Clark & Gronlund, 1996;Humphreys, Pike, Bain, & Tehan, 1989). Context effects continue to be of interest in dual process theories of recognition, with contextual information potentially playing a role in both the familiarity and recollection components of the theories (Hockley, 2008). However, context effects are still not well understood.The present paper seeks to contribute further to understanding these effects. This is significant not only in theory but has important real-world applications, because memory can be important to the determination of legal questions. One example commonly explored in the literature is eyewitness identification evidence, but in this paper we establish a significant applied need for understanding the impact of context effects because of their implications for trade mark law and other areas of the law that are concerned with enabling consumers to reliably identify desired products and avoid confusion when acquiring products and services.Consumers are frequently challenged to discriminate between the brand they are looking for and a look-alike product. This can be difficult especially when the look-alike product has things in common with the sought-for brand -that is, has common context. For the purpose of understanding how consumers recognize a product that is displayed on a shelf or depicted on a website we consider context to include the physical location, the shoppers' understanding of the physical location (e.g., an upmarket retail outlet), and any aspects of the 1 In the recognition literature context includes the learning location (study room), internal states (mood), the subject's understanding of the situation (psy...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.