Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, which can provide results rapidly to guide therapeutic decision-making, offer patient care advantages over laboratory-based tests that require several days to provide results. We compared results from the Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG (Xpert) assay to results from two currently approved nucleic acid amplification assays in 1,722 female and 1,387 male volunteers. Results for chlamydia in females demonstrated sensitivities for endocervical, vaginal, and urine samples of 97.4%, 98.7%, and 97.6%, respectively, and for urine samples from males, a sensitivity of 97.5%, with all specificity estimates being >99.4%. Results for gonorrhea in females demonstrated sensitivities for endocervical, vaginal, and urine samples of 100.0%, 100.0%, and 95.6%, respectively, and for urine samples from males, a sensitivity of 98.0%, with all estimates of specificity being >99.8%. These results indicate that this short-turnaround-time test can be used to accurately test patients and to possibly do so at the site of care, thus potentially improving chlamydia and gonorrhea control efforts. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are the agents of the two most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), accounting for Ͼ1.6 million reported infections in the United States in 2010 (1). The CDC estimates that STIs cost the health care system $1.5 billion annually. Since these infections, especially chlamydia, are most often asymptomatic, the CDC recommends yearly screening for chlamydia in all sexually active women aged 16 to 25 years. Further, since coinfections are common, most diagnostic test platforms assay for both organisms. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are now recommended by the CDC (2) as the tests of choice; however, current NAATs are classified as being of high or moderate complexity and might take 1 to 2 days for results to become available. New assays and new platforms that provide results at the time of patient visits are urgently needed, since many patients do not return for their results when laboratory-based tests that require several days for their results are performed (3, 4).The Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG (Xpert) assay is a rapid (Ͻ2 h to results) NAAT assay that can be performed in on-site laboratories. The assay detects the DNA of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from endocervical, vaginal, and urine specimens of females, as well as from urine specimens of males, from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The Xpert test is performed using a modular cartridge-based platform for testing each specimen by nucleic acid amplification, and it can process from 1 to 96 specimens in Ͻ2 h with easy-to-use cartridges that minimize processing steps and contamination. This study compares the clinical performance (as measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the Xpert assay to the patient infection status (PIS)...

Background Extragenital gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) are usually asymptomatic and only detected through screening. Ceftriaxone plus azithromycin is the recommended GC treatment; monotherapy (azithromycin or doxycycline) is recommended for CT. In urethral CT-positive/urethral GC-negative persons who are not screened extragenitally, CT monotherapy can lead to GC undertreatment and may foster the development of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance. We assessed urethral and extragenital GC and CT positivity among men who have sex with men (MSM) attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Methods We included visit data for MSM tested for GC and CT at 30 sexually transmitted disease clinics in 10 jurisdictions during January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Using an inverse-variance random effects model to account for heterogeneity between jurisdictions, we calculated weighted test visit positivity estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for GC and CT at urethral and extragenital sites, and extragenital GC among urethral CT-positive/GC-negative test visits. Results Of 139,718 GC and CT test visits, we calculated overall positivity (GC, 16.7% [95% CI, 14.4–19.1]; CT, 13.3% [95% CI, 12.7–13.9]); urethral positivity (GC, 7.5% [95% CI, 5.7–9.3]; CT, 5.2% [95% CI, 4.6–5.8]); rectal positivity (GC, 11.8% [95% CI, 10.4–13.2]; CT, 12.6% [95% CI, 11.8–13.4]); and pharyngeal positivity (GC, 9.1% [95% CI, 7.9–10.3]; CT, 1.8% [95% CI, 1.6–2.0]). Of 4566 urethral CT-positive/GC-negative test visits with extragenital testing, extragenital GC positivity was 12.5% (95% CI, 10.9–14.1). Conclusions Extragenital GC and CT were common among MSM. Without extragenital screening of MSM with urethral CT, extragenital GC would have been undetected and undertreated in approximately 13% of these men. Undertreatment could potentially select for antimicrobial resistance. These findings underscore the importance of extragenital screening in MSM.

No abstract

We describe the emergence of an azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae variant in a man from Portland, Oregon, during sole treatment with 2 g azithromycin. This report highlights the ease with which gonococcal macrolide resistance can emerge, the threat of multidrug resistant N. gonorrhoeae, and the need for adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention treatment guidelines.

There are significant psychological, social, and cultural dimensions to the HIV epidemic in the United States, especially among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) communities. Biomedical HIV treatment has been shown to impact these dimensions. However, there is little understanding of the real-world psychosocial and sociocultural effects of the latest biomedical HIV prevention strategy, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This study explored the psychosocial and sociocultural dimensions of PrEP use among LGBTQ adults. We interviewed 23 LGBTQ adults who were current or former users of PrEP. Results included that PrEP users' experiences were shaped by multiple forms of stigma. Participants were highly motivated to challenge PrEP stigma and to support PrEP use among other community members.Lastly, participants described positive impacts on their individual well-being and their sexual partnerships. Findings suggest that PrEP has significant impacts beyond biomedical outcomes for both the individuals who use PrEP and their communities.