PurposeAvailability of comorbidity assessment at multi-disciplinary team (MDT) discussions is cornerstone in making the MDT process more robust and decisive in optimising treatment and improving quality of survivorship. Comorbidity assessments using tools, such as the ACE-27 questionnaire would aid in optimising the decision-making process at MDTs so that treatment decisions can be made without delay. This study determined the availability of comorbidity data in a CRC MDT and the feasibility of routine comorbidity data collection using the validated ACE-27 questionnaire. Secondary aims determined the optimal time and method of collecting comorbidity data.MethodsA retrospective mapping exercise (phase I; 6-months) examined the availability of comorbidity data within the MDT. Phase II prospectively collected comorbidity data using ACE-27 for a 3-month period following a short pilot.ResultsIn phase I, 73/135 (54%) patients had comorbidity data readily available informing the MDT discussion; 62 patients lacked this information. After a review of the patient records, it was clear that 41 of these 62 also had comorbidities and 21 out of the 135 had ≥ 2 major system disorders. Common referral sources to the MDT were surgical outpatient clinics (42%) and the endoscopy unit (13%). The average lead-time from referral to MDT discussion was 14 days. In phase II, an ACE-27 questionnaire was prospectively administered in 50 patients, mean age 54 years (range 20–84). Male: female ratio 26:24. Average time to administer ACE-27 was 4.8 min (range 1–15).ConclusionsThe phase I study confirmed the widely acknowledged view of poor comorbidity data availability within a CRC MDT. Phase II demonstrated the feasibility of routinely collecting comorbidity data using ACE-27.
Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is a new non−invasive treatment for patients with faecal incontinence that can be given in an outpatient setting by specialist nurses. It is safe and cost effective (Shafik et al, 2003) and early data suggest it is as effective as established alternative treatments. This article reviews the development of the technique and early clinical studies into its effectiveness, how it is carried out and the experience at Barts and the London NHS Trust. It then goes on to discuss the implications for specialist practice and the need for continuing research to extend one′s knowledge of this treatment option for faecal incontinence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.