Central venous catheters (CVCs) are a common adjunct to hemophilia therapy, but the risk of CVC-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hemophiliacs is not well defined. In a previous study, 13 patients with CVCs had no radiographic evidence of DVT. However, recent abstracts and case studies demonstrate that DVT does occur. Therefore, this study sought to determine the frequency of DVT in children with hemophilia and long-term CVCs and to correlate venographic findings with clinical features. All hemophilia patients with tunneled subclavian CVCs in place for 12 months or more were candidates for evaluation. Patients were examined for physical signs of DVT and questioned about catheter dysfunction. Contrast venograms were obtained to identify DVT. Fifteen boys with severe hemophilia were evaluated, including 9 from the initially studied group of 13. Eight patients had evidence of DVT, 5 of whom previously had normal venograms.

Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence-based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD-related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re-assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.

No abstract

Arthroscopic synovectomy significantly reduces hemorrhage into the index joint and allows for stabilization of joint range of motion. This procedure should be considered in young hemophilia patients with chronic synovitis.

To assess the risk of deep vein thrombosis in haemophiliacs with long-term central venous catheters, we studied haemophiliacs followed at our centre with implantable venous access devices (ports) in place for > 6 months. Medical records were reviewed for a history of catheter-related complications. Each patient was examined for physical stigmata of thrombosis. Patency of the vessels was evaluated by contrast venography. Of 21 males with ports, 19 had factor VIII deficiency and two factor IX deficiency. Nineteen ports were evaluable (i.e. were in place for > 6 months). Seventeen patients have their original ports in place; two ports were replaced for mechanical dysfunction (1) and recurrent infection (1). Difficulty withdrawing or infusing occurred with three ports, two of which were cleared with urokinase. Physical examination was normal on all 19 patients. Venograms were performed in 13 of 19 patients. Parents of the remaining six patients refused venography because of the need for peripheral venipuncture. One patient had a small nonocclusive thrombus on the same side as his functioning catheter, and another had minimal narrowing of the subclavian vein at the site of a prior catheter. The overall prevalence of clinically relevant upper venous system thrombosis identifiable by contrast venography was zero (95% CI, 0-23%). We conclude that haemophiliacs do not have as high a risk of thrombosis as other populations of patients with central venous catheters. The theoretical risk of thrombosis should not preclude use of central venous catheters in patients with haemophilia.

Elective surgical procedures involving central venous access devices (CVADs) in patients with haemophilia are often necessary for adequate factor delivery but there are few data regarding haemostatic coverage and acute complication rates accompanying these procedures. To describe experience with CVAD insertion, revision and removal in young haemophilia patients at our institution and in the literature and to assess acute complications following CVAD procedures. PubMed, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for articles, which included a description of factor coverage during CVAD procedures. A retrospective review of our comprehensive haemophilia database identified patients undergoing CVAD placement, revision and removal between January 1993 and August 2005. Manual and electronic searches of the published literature yielded 14 articles, which met inclusion criteria. Peri-operative factor administration varied greatly among the reports. Mean acute infection and haematoma rates were 8% and 12.5% respectively. A retrospective review identified 49 CVAD placements, revisions, or removals meeting inclusion criteria. Most patients received outpatient bolus factor replacement to achieve a level of 100% preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7. Thirty-six procedures were performed without hospitalization. Ten patients developed 11 (22%) minor haematomas postoperatively. Major haemorrhage, acute infection, or pneumothorax was not encountered. Few published data exist regarding haemostatic coverage and complications following CVAD procedures. Our institutional experience using a consistent management approach was favourable. Further studies are required to define optimal haemostatic coverage during minor surgical procedures in haemophilia.

The AFFIRM Study enrolled 4060 predominantly elderly patients with atrial fibrillation to compare ventricular rate control with rhythm control. The patients in the AFFIRM Study were representative of patients at high risk for complications from atrial fibrillation, which indicates that the results of this large clinical trial will be relevant to patient care.

No abstract