We examined the impact of pretreatment neutrophil count on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 388 chemo-naïve patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC from a randomised controlled trial were evaluated. The effects of pretreatment peripheral blood neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on survival were examined using the proportional hazards regression model to estimate hazard ratios after adjustment for covariates. The optimal cut-off value was determined by proportional hazards regression analysis with the minimum P-value approach and shrinkage procedure. After adjustment for prognostic factors, the pretreatment elevated neutrophil count was statistically significantly associated with short overall (P=0.0008) and progression-free survival (P=0.024), whereas no association was found between prognosis and lymphocyte or monocyte count. The cut-off value selected for neutrophil count was 4500 mm(-3) (corrected hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-2.54). The median survival time was 19.3 months (95%CI, 16.5-21.4) for the low-neutrophil group (4500 mm(-3), n=204) and was 10.2 months (95%CI, 8.0-12.3) for the high-neutrophil group (4500 mm(-3), n=184). We confirmed that pretreatment elevated neutrophil count is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving modern chemotherapy. Neutrophil count is easily measured at low cost, and it may be a useful indicator of patient prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is a common adverse reaction of chemotherapy. We assessed whether chemotherapy-induced neutropenia could be a predictor of survival for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 387 chemotherapy-naïve patients who received chemotherapy (vinorelbine and gemcitabine followed by docetaxel, or paclitaxel and carboplatin) in a randomised controlled trial were evaluated. The proportional-hazards regression model was used to examine the effects of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and tumour response on overall survival. Landmark analysis was used to lessen the bias of more severe neutropenia resulting from more treatment cycles allowed by longer survival, whereby patients who died within 126 days of starting chemotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratios for patients with grade-1 to 2 neutropenia or grade-3 to 4 neutropenia compared with no neutropenia were 0.59 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 -0.97) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49 -1.03), respectively. The hazard ratios did not differ significantly between the patients who developed neutropenia with stable disease (SD), and those who lacked neutropenia with partial response (PR). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a predictor of better survival for patients with advanced NSCLC. Prospective randomised trials of early-dose increases guided by chemotherapy-induced toxicities are warranted.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate useful prognostic factors of immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively observed 73 patients who underwent immunotherapy (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab) for lung cancer. The systemic inflammatory score (SIS) was calculated as the sum of the following factors scored one point each: Hemoglobin <12.5 g/dl and serum albumin <3.6 g/dl, resulting in scores of 0-2. We examined the correlation between the SIS and initial tumor response and progression-free and overall survival with other existing markers, namely tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); modified Glasgow prognostic score; and prognostic nutritional index, etc. Results: SIS ≤1 was significantly associated with better initial tumor response. In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression ≥50% (p=0.010), SIS ≤1 (p=0.028) and NLR <5.6 (p=0.047) were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival, and SIS ≤1 (p=0.030) and NLR <5.6 (p=0.037) were associated with longer overall survival. Conclusion: SIS is a useful marker of the efficacy of immunotherapy that can be obtained via routine blood tests.Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate worldwide of all cancer types (1, 2). In recent years, the emergence of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has drastically changed the strategy for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. ICIs improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer (3-5).The expression level of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells is determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC). PD-L1 is a significant predictive marker of ICIs; however, it is not a sufficient indicator of the efficacy of immunotherapy. Several serum-based parameters related to systemic inflammation and nutritional status of patients have been studied as predictive or prognostic markers during immunotherapy, such as the neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (6-8). However, the unified cutoff points for these metrics and other parameters that are more sensitive than these markers are controversial.This study aimed to investigate factors of the efficacy of immunotherapy that are readily available via routine blood tests. We focused on the combination of hemoglobin (Hb) and serum albumin levels. Patients and MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients with inoperable lung cancer who underwent monotherapy with ICIs,

The guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) do not recommend the measurement of pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This is on the basis that the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) does not provide more clinical information than measurement of the oxygen tension in arterial blood (PaO2). The mPAP correlates well with PaO2 in emphysema patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO2 < or = 7.3 kPa (55 mmHg)). However, the occurrence and significance of mPAP is unclear in patients without severe hypoxemia (PaO2 > 7.3 kPa (55 mmHg)). In order to evaluate the usefulness of measurement of mPAP in emphysema patients without severe hypoxemia, we performed right heart catheterization and investigated the pulmonary hemodynamics of 53 patients without severe hypoxemia. In addition, we identified long-term prognostic factors with a mean follow-up term of 77 months after right heart catheterization. Seventeen of 27 patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia exhibited pulmonary hypertension (mPAP > or = 2.7 kPa (20 mmHg)) and the classification according to severity in GOLD exhibited a greater correlation to mPAP than PaO2. Moreover, only mPAP was found to be a significant prognostic factor according to multivariate proportional hazards analysis (P = 0.01). We conclude that mPAP is more informative about the severity of emphysema than PaO2 in patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia.