Background and Purpose-The role of the sympathetic nervous system in cerebral autoregulation remains poorly characterized. We examined cerebral blood flow responses to augmented arterial pressure oscillations with and without sympathetic blockade and compared them with responses in the forearm circulation. Methods-An oscillatory lower body negative pressure of 40 mm Hg was used at 6 frequencies from 0.03 to 0.08 Hz in 11 healthy subjects with and without ␣-adrenergic blockade by phentolamine. Results-Sympathetic blockade resulted in unchanged mean pressure and cerebral flow. The transfer function relationship to arterial pressure at frequencies Ͼ0.05 Hz was significantly increased in both the cerebral and brachial circulations, but the coherence of the relation remained weak at the lowest frequencies in the cerebral circulation. Conclusion-Our data demonstrate a strong, frequency-dependent role for sympathetic regulation of blood flow in both cerebral and brachial circulations. However, marked differences in the response to blockade suggest the control of the cerebral circulation at longer time scales is characterized by important nonlinearities and relies on regulatory mechanisms other than the sympathetic system. (Stroke. 2010;41:102-109.)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in humans and is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Despite its prevalence, our mechanistic understanding is incomplete, the therapeutic options have limited efficacy, and are often fraught with risks. A better biological understanding of AF is needed to spearhead novel therapeutic avenues. Although “natural” AF is nearly nonexistent in most species, animal models have contributed significantly to our understanding of AF and some therapeutic options. However, the impediments of animal models are also apparent and stem largely from the differences in basic physiology as well as the complexities underlying human AF; these preclude the creation of a “perfect” animal model and have obviated the translation of animal findings. Herein, we review the vast array of AF models available, spanning the mouse heart (weighing 1/1000th of a human heart) to the horse heart (10× heavier than the human heart). We attempt to highlight the features of each model that bring value to our understanding of AF but also the shortcomings and pitfalls. Finally, we borrowed the concept of a SWOT analysis from the business community (which stands for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) and applied this introspective type of analysis to animal models for AF. We identify unmet needs and stress that is in the context of rapidly advancing technologies, these present opportunities for the future use of animal models.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) demonstrates significant muscarinic-receptor antagonism during methacholine (MCh)-stimulated sweating in human forearm skin. Three intradermal microdialysis probes were placed in the skin of eight healthy adults (4 men and 4 women). MCh in the range of 0.033-243 mM in nine steps was perfused through a microdialysis probe with and without the presence of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME (10 mM) or the L-arginine analog NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 10 mM). Local sweat rate (sweat rate) and skin blood flow (laser-Doppler velocimetry) were measured directly over each microdialysis probe. We observed similar resting sweat rates at MCh only, MCh and L-NAME, and MCh and L-NMMA sites averaging 0.175 +/- 0.029, 0.186 +/- 0.034, and 0.139 +/- 0.027 mg x min(-1) x cm(-2), respectively. Peak sweat rate (0.46 +/- 0.11, 0.56 +/- 0.16, and 0.53 +/- 0.16. mg x min(-1) x cm(-2)) was also similar among all three sites. MCh produced a sigmoid-shape dose-response curve and 50% of the maximal attainable response (0.42 +/- 0.14 mM for MCh only) was shifted rightward shift in the presence of L-NAME or L-NMMA (2.88 +/- 0.79 and 3.91 +/- 1.14 mM, respectively; P < 0.05). These results indicate that nitric oxide acts to augment MCh-stimulated sweat gland function in human skin. In addition, L-NAME consistently blunted the MCh-induced vasodilation, whereas L-NMMA did not. These data support the hypothesis that muscarinic-induced dilation in cutaneous blood vessels is not mediated by nitric oxide production and that the role of L-NAME in attenuating acetylcholine-induced vasodilation may be due to its potential to act as a muscarinic-receptor antagonist.
The role of skin temperature in reflex control of the active cutaneous vasodilator system was examined in six subjects during mild graded heat stress imposed by perfusing water at 34, 36, 38, and 40 degrees C through a tube-lined garment. Skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) was recorded from the peroneal nerve with microneurography. While monitoring esophageal, mean skin, and local skin temperatures, we recorded skin blood flow at bretylium-treated and untreated skin sites by using laser-Doppler velocimetry and local sweat rate by using capacitance hygrometry on the dorsal foot. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated by dividing skin blood flow by mean arterial pressure. Mild heat stress increased mean skin temperature by 0.2 or 0.3 degrees C every stage, but esophageal and local skin temperature did not change during the first three stages. CVC at the bretylium tosylate-treated site (CVC(BT)) and sweat expulsion number increased at 38 and 40 degrees C compared with 34 degrees C (P < 0.05); however, CVC at the untreated site did not change. SSNA increased at 40 degrees C (P < 0.05, different from 34 degrees C). However, SSNA burst amplitude increased (P < 0.05), whereas SSNA burst duration decreased (P < 0.05), at the same time as we observed the increase in CVC(BT) and sweat expulsion number. These data support the hypothesis that the active vasodilator system is activated by changes in mean skin temperature, even at normal core temperature, and illustrate the intricate competition between active vasodilator and the vasoconstrictor system for control of skin blood flow during mild heat stress.
Spontaneous baroreflex control of pulse interval (PI) was assessed in healthy volunteers under thermoneutral and heat stress conditions. Subjects rested in the supine position with their lower legs in a water bath at 34 degrees C. Heat stress was imposed by increasing the bath temperature to 44 degrees C. Arterial blood pressure (Finapres), PI (ECG), esophageal and skin temperature, and stroke volume were continuously collected during each 5-min experimental stage. Spontaneous baroreflex function was evaluated by multiple techniques, including 1) the mean slope of the linear relationship between PI and systolic blood pressure (SBP) with three or more simultaneous increasing or decreasing sequences, 2) the linear relationship between changes in PI and SBP (deltaPI/DeltaSBP) derived by using the first differential equation, 3) the linear relationship between changes in PI and SBP with simultaneously increasing or decreasing sequences (+deltaPI/+deltaSBP or -deltaPI/-deltaSBP), and 4) transfer function analysis. Heat stress increased esophageal temperature by 0.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C, decreased PI from 1,007 +/- 43 to 776 +/- 37 ms and stroke volume by 16 +/- 5 ml/beat. Heat stress reduced baroreflex sensitivity but increased the incidence of baroreflex slopes from 5.2 +/- 0.8 to 8.6 +/- 0.9 sequences per 100 heartbeats. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly correlated with PI or vagal power (r2 = 0.45, r2 = 0.71, respectively; P < 0.05). However, the attenuation in baroreflex sensitivity during heat stress appeared related to a shift in autonomic balance (shift in resting PI) rather than heat stress per se.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.