Promoting self‐narrative coherence is seen in this paper as one of the key tasks in therapy. In our narrative study, we attempted to form specific coding criteria for assessing coherence based on the intelligibility of ‘life stories’. Thirty clients (‘graduates’ and beginners) in family‐oriented group therapy took part. We conducted an informal autobiographical interview and asked clients to write a self‐description. Our qualitative analysis focused mainly on narrative form. We created a coding system of four coding criteria, ‘acknowledging/explaining contradictions’, ‘thinking in a relational manner’, ‘acknowledging/responding to the needs of the audience’, and ‘being in touch with emotions’. The latter criterion was further explored and a secondary coding system developed for the emotional assessment of narratives. Two case studies are used as exemplars. The variations as to the degree of self‐narrative incoherence are discussed. Proposals are made for using the four coding criteria as a ‘subjective’ assessment tool for monitoring therapy progress.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.