Objectives: Anatomical lobectomy has always been the standard operative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, there have been emerging evidences suggesting that a subanatomical resection, such as segmentectomy, may yield the same treatment results, even in patients with higher-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to compare overall 5-year survival rate and disease-free survival between lobectomy and segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: The retrospective study included 380 patients who underwent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer at Ramathibodi Hospital between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2020. Of 380 patients, 307 patients underwent lobectomy, while the other 73 patients underwent segmentectomy. Operative, admission, and follow-up data were collected from electronic medical records. Missing data were collected by telephone calls to patients or their relatives in deceased cases. Overall and disease-free survival were analyzed. Results: Median overall 5-year survival time after lobectomy and segmentectomy seemed to be different but not statistically significant (18.5 months versus 5.8 months, p = 0.127). Median disease-free survival time after lobectomy and segmentectomy was also similar (8.6 months versus 4.5 months, p = 0.511). Two deaths occurred during perioperative period, one from lobectomy group due to acute massive pulmonary embolism (0.3%) and the other from segmentectomy group due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure (1.4%). Conclusion: Lobectomy and segmentectomy result in similar overall 5-year survival rate and disease-free survival between these two comparison groups. Therefore, segmentectomy may be a potential alternative for operative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, a larger and randomized-controlled trial may be needed to further validate these results.
Objectives Since the introduction of surgical implantation of conduit for right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery pathway reconstruction, there has been a number of studies on possible factors which might potentially affect conduit longevity, as well as patient’s reintervention-free and overall survival. Still, no definite consensual agreement could be made thus far. We aimed to compare conduit longevity, reintervention-free survival, and overall survival between patients with congenital heart diseases indicated for operations involving right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery pathway reconstruction whose conduits were placed heterotopically to those with orthotopically placed ones.Materials and Methods We retrospectively collected data from electronic medical records of Ramathibodi hospital from 1st January 2005 to 31st December 2022. Patients with congenital heart diseases whose operations involved reconstruction of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery continuity were included. Patients whose medical record data were significantly missing were excluded. Demographic data, operative, and postoperative details were collected and reviewed.Results There were 67 patients included in our study, with 25 receiving orthotopic and the other 42 receiving heterotopic conduit implantation. Conduit dysfunction-free, reintervention-free, and overall survival were not statistically different between both groups. There were no deaths up to the end date of our study.Conclusions Conduits placed on a heterotopic position did not result in worse longevity, reintervention-free survival, as well as overall survival when compared to conduits placed on an orthotopic position. This suggested that the less technically demanding heterotopic conduit placement could be recommended as an operation of choice for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.