The composition of the gut microbiota is highly dynamic and changes according to various conditions. The gut microbiota mainly includes difficult-to-cultivate anaerobic bacteria, hence knowledge about its composition has significantly arisen from culture-independent methods based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) such as 16S profiling and shotgun metagenomics. The gut microbiota of patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) undergoes many alterations because of critical illness, antibiotics, and other ICU-specific medications. It is then characterized by lower richness and diversity, and dominated by opportunistic pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile and multidrug-resistant bacteria. These alterations are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications or death. Specifically, at the time of writing, it appears possible to identify distinct microbiota patterns associated with severity or infectivity in COVID-19 patients, paving the way for the potential use of dysbiosis markers to predict patient outcomes. Correcting the microbiota disturbances to avoid their consequences is now possible. Fecal microbiota transplantation is recommended in recurrent C. difficile infections and microbiota-protecting treatments such as antibiotic inactivators are currently being developed. The growing interest in the microbiota and microbiota-associated therapies suggests that the control of the dysbiosis could be a key factor in the management of critically ill patients. The present narrative review aims to provide a synthetic overview of microbiota, from healthy individuals to critically ill patients. After an introduction to the different techniques used for studying the microbiota, we review the determinants involved in the alteration of the microbiota in ICU patients and the latter’s consequences. Last, we assess the means to prevent or correct microbiota alteration.
Background The composition of the digestive microbiota may be associated with outcome and infections in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The dominance by opportunistic pathogens (such as Enterococcus) has been associated with death. However, whether this association remains all throughout the hospitalization are lacking. Methods We performed a single-center observational prospective cohort study in critically ill patients admitted with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs were collected at admission and then twice weekly until discharge or death. Quantitative cultures for opportunistic pathogens were performed on oropharyngeal and rectal swabs. The composition of the intestinal microbiota was assessed by 16S rDNA sequencing. Oropharyngeal and intestinal concentrations of opportunistic pathogens, intestinal richness and diversity were entered into a multivariable Cox model as time-dependent covariates. The primary outcome was death at day 90. Results From March to September 2020, 95 patients (765 samples) were included. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS 2) at admission was 33 [24; 50] and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA score) at 6 [4; 8]. Day 90 all-cause mortality was 44.2% (42/95). We observed that the oropharyngeal and rectal concentrations of Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Candida spp. were associated with a higher risk of death. This association remained significant after adjustment for prognostic covariates (age, chronic disease, daily antimicrobial agent use and daily SOFA score). A one-log increase in Enterococcus spp., S. aureus and Candida spp. in oropharyngeal or rectal swabs was associated with a 17% or greater increase in the risk of death. Conclusion We found that elevated oropharyngeal/intestinal Enterococcus spp. S. aureus and Candida spp. concentrations, assessed by culture, are associated with mortality, independent of age, organ failure, and antibiotic therapy, opening prospects for simple and inexpensive microbiota-based markers for the prognosis of critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients.
Carbapenems are considered last-line beta-lactams for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, their activity is compromised by the rising prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), which are especially marked in the Indian subcontinent. In Pakistan, previous reports have warned about the possible spread of CPE in the community, but data are still partial. This study was carried out to analyse the prevalence of CPE, the genetic characterisation, and phylogenetic links among the spreading CPE in the community. In this cohort study, we collected 306 rectal swabs from patients visiting Benazir Bhutto hospital, Rawalpindi. CPEs were screened by using ertapenem-supplemented MacConkey agar. Identification was performed by using conventional biochemical tests, and genomes were sequenced using Illumina chemistry. Antibiotic resistance genes, plasmid incompatibility groups, and Escherichia coli phylogroups were determined in silico. Sequence types were determined by using MLST tool. The prevalence of CPE carriage observed was 14.4% (44/306 samples). The most common carbapenemase-encoding gene was bla-NDM-5 (n = 58) followed by blaNDM-1 (n = 7), blaNDM (non-assigned variant, n = 4), blaOXA-181 (n = 3), blaOXA-232 (n = 3) and blaNDM-7 (n = 1). Most of the CPE were E. coli (55/64, 86%), and the genomic analysis revealed a pauciclonal diffusion of E. coli with ST167 (n = 14), 405 (n = 10), 940 (n = 8), 648 (n = 6) and 617 (n = 5). We obtained a second sample from 94 patients during their hospital stay in whom carriage was negative at admission and found that 7 (7.4%) acquired a CPE. Our results indicate that the prevalence of CPE carriage in the Pakistani urban community was high and driven by the dissemination of some E. coli clones, with ST167 being the most frequent. The high CPE carriage in the community poses a serious public health threat and calls for implementation of adequate preventive measures.
Background. The increasing incidence of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacilli (C-PGNB) represents a major public health challenge. Rapid detection of the digestive colonization with C-PGNB is fundamental to control their spread. Aim. Validation of a rapid protocol for C-PGNB detection directly on rectal swabs. Methods. We developed a protocol combining enrichment by a rapid selective subculture of the rectal swab medium and realization of a Resist-4 OKNV K-SeT® test on the bacterial pellet so obtained. The limit of detection and performances of this protocol were validated in vitro on 52 C-PGNB strains spiked on calibrated sample suspension; and confirmed in clinical settings on 144 rectal swabs sampled from patients with C-PGNB digestive colonization (n=48) and controls (patients with ESBL colonization (n=48) and without carbapenemase/ESBL (n=48)). Results. The protocol detected with 100% sensitivity the presence of the 15 OXA-48-, 14 KPC-, 13 NDM- and 10 VIM-producing GNB from 103 CFU/mL. The limit of detection was 2.102 CFU/mL. Among the 48 C-PGNB containing rectal swabs of the validation cohort, 46 were accurately detected. False negative were observed for 1 NDM-producing Acinetobacter baumanii and 1 OXA-48-producing E. coli. The 96 control swabs were negative. Sensitivity and specificity for C-PGNB detection were 97.7% 95%CI(87.7-100) and 100% 95%CI(96.2-100). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.04 95%CI(0.01-0.16). Considering a C-PGNB digestive colonization prevalence between 0.01% and 0.1%, positive and negative predictive values were 100%. Conclusion. Our protocol is a rapid and low-cost method detecting accurately the digestive colonization with C-PE in 4 hours without any requirement for specific equipment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.