Background For low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), active surveillance (AS) may confer comparable oncological outcomes to radical prostatectomy (RP). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes are important to consider, yet few studies have examined HRQoL for patients managed with AS. This study compared longitudinal HRQoL in a prospective, racially diverse, and contemporary cohort of patients who underwent RP or AS for low-risk PCa. Methods Beginning in 2007, HRQoL data from validated questionnaires (EPIC and SF-36) were collected by the Center for Prostate Disease Research in a multi-center national database. Patients aged ≤75 that were diagnosed with low-risk PCa and elected RP or AS for initial disease management were followed for three years. Mean scores were estimated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for baseline HRQoL, demographic and clinical patient characteristics. Results Of the patients with low-risk PCa, 228 underwent RP and 77 underwent AS. Multivariable analysis revealed that RP patients had significantly worse sexual function, sexual bother, and urinary function at all time points compared to patients on AS. Differences in mental health between groups were below the threshold for clinical significance at one year. Conclusions This study found no differences in mental health outcomes but worse urinary and sexual HRQoL for RP patients compared to AS patients for up to three years. These data offer support for management of low risk PCa with AS as a means for postponing the morbidity associated with RP without concomitant mental health declines.

No abstract

CE is a marker of severe injury but does not mandate angiography. Associated injuries are common and other sources of blood loss must be excluded. CE is not reliable enough to exclude significant vascular injury, as the therapeutic embolization rate for CE-negative patients undergoing angiography is 33%.

Bilateral stage I neuromodulation trial provides a significantly higher rate of improvement in refractory voiding symptoms to allow for the progress to stage II implantation.

Background Severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a devastating worldwide pandemic. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, but clinical data supporting HCQ for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received �1 dose of HCQ at two New York City hospitals. We measured incident Grade 3 or 4 blood count and liver test abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias, and vomiting and diarrhea within 10 days after HCQ initiation, and the proportion of patients who completed HCQ therapy. We also describe changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment hypoxia scores between baseline and day 10 after HCQ initiation and in-hospital mortality. Results None of the 153 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received HCQ developed a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Incident blood count and liver test abnormalities occurred in <15% of patients and incident vomiting or diarrhea was rare. Eighty-nine percent of patients completed their HCQ course and three patients discontinued therapy because of QT prolongation. Fifty-two percent of patients had improved hypoxia scores 10 days after starting HCQ. Thirty-one percent of patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation at the time of HCQ initiation died during their hospitalization, compared to 18% of patients who were receiving supplemental oxygen but not requiring mechanical ventilation, and 8% of patients who were not requiring supplemental oxygen. Co-administration of azithromycin was not associated with improved outcomes.