Background-The underlying electrophysiological mechanism that causes an abnormal ECG pattern and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with the Brugada syndrome (BrS) remains unelucidated. However, several studies have indicated that the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is likely to be the site of electrophysiological substrate. We hypothesized that in patients with BrS who have frequent recurrent VF episodes, the substrate site is the RVOT, either over the epicardium or endocardium; abnormal electrograms would be identified at this location, which would serve as the target site for catheter ablation. Methods and Results-We studied 9 symptomatic patients with the BrS (all men; median age 38 years) who had recurrent VF episodes (median 4 episodes) per month, necessitating implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge. Electroanatomic mapping of the right ventricle, both endocardially and epicardially, and epicardial mapping of the left ventricle were performed in all patients during sinus rhythm. All patients had typical type 1 Brugada ECG pattern and inducible VT/VF; they were found to have unique abnormal low voltage (0.94Ϯ0.79 mV), prolonged duration (132Ϯ48 ms), and fractionated late potentials (96Ϯ47 ms beyond QRS complex) clustering exclusively in the anterior aspect of the RVOT epicardium. Ablation at these sites rendered VT/VF noninducible (7 of 9 patients [78%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.97, Pϭ0.015) and normalization of the Brugada ECG pattern in 89% (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.99; Pϭ0.008). Long-term outcomes (20Ϯ6 months) were excellent, with no recurrent VT/VF in all patients off medication (except 1 patient on amiodarone). Conclusions-The underlying electrophysiological mechanism in patients with BrS is delayed depolarization over the anterior aspect of the RVOT epicardium. Catheter ablation over this abnormal area results in normalization of the Brugada ECG pattern and prevents VT/VF, both during electrophysiological studies as well as spontaneous recurrent VT/VF episodes in patients with BrS. (Circulation. 2011;123:1270-1279.)

Right bundle-branch block and precordial injury pattern in V1 through V3 is common in SUDS patients and represents an arrhythmogenic marker that identifies patients who face an inordinate risk of ventricular fibrillation or sudden death.

Our aim was to study the cause and describe the clinical features of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PHT) in splenectomized beta-thalassemia (beta-Thal) patients. Ten splenectomized beta-Thal patients with systolic pulmonary artery (PA) pressure >30 mm Hg were evaluated by echocardiography, right-heart catheterization, and pulmonary angiography. Five of these patients later underwent hemodynamic studies. Echocardiography and pulmonary angiography on the 10 patients showed normal values of left ventricular systolic function and no findings of acute or chronic pulmonary embolism. Hemodynamic evaluation showed very high PA pressures associated with markedly increased pulmonary vascular resistance indices (PVRIs). Hematological evaluation of the 10 patients showed marked anemia, markedly increased numbers of nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs), and serum ferritin. Mean platelet count, plasma beta2 thromboglobulin, and thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels were significantly increased. It was concluded that PHT can be found in splenectomized beta-Thal patients. Features associated with PHT were female sex, hemoglobin E/beta-Thal, status many years postsplenectomy, marked anemia, markedly increased nRBC count, thrombocytosis, and very high serum ferritin levels. PHT was not due to pulmonary emboli. Our findings suggested that severe PHT was due to increased PVRI from thrombotic pulmonary arteriopathy, likely from chronic low-grade hypercoagulability and platelet activation after splenectomy.

Background-Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome (SUDS) is the leading cause of death in young, healthy, Southeast Asian men. The role of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for mortality reduction in these patients remains unclear. Methods and Results-The Defibrillator Versus ␤-Blockers for Unexplained Death in Thailand (DEBUT) study is a randomized, clinical trial conducted in 2 phases (pilot study followed by the main trial) to compare the annual all-cause mortality rates among SUDS patients treated with ␤-blockers versus that among those treated with an ICD. A total of 86 patients who were SUDS survivors and probable SUDS survivors were randomized to receive an ICD or propranolol (20 patients were in the pilot study and 66 were in the main trial). The primary end point was death from all causes. The secondary end point was recurrent ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VF) or cardiac arrest. During the 3-year follow-up period of the main trial, there were 4 deaths; all occurred in the ␤-blocker group (Pϭ0.02). Seven subjects in the ICD arm had recurrent VF, and all were effectively treated by the ICD. On the basis of the main trial results, the Data Safety Monitoring Board stopped the study. In total (both from the Pilot study and the main trial), there were 7 deaths (18%) in the ␤-blocker group and no deaths in the ICD group, but there were a total of 12 ICD patients receiving ICD discharges due to recurrent VF. Conclusions-ICD treatment provides full protection from death related to primary VF in a SUDS population and is superior to ␤-blockade treatment.